We performed a comparison between Bizagi and OutSystems based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Low-Code Development Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is that it is compatible with Visual Studio and .NET, and we can program it. Its speed is very good, and it is also stable and easy to deploy."
"Great software for managing my business. I think this is the best business process management software."
"BPMN 2.0 compliance, while you model the processes, the system can detect your notation errors."
"The natural notation is the best feature of Bizagi because it makes it compatible with other products."
"Great mapping feature that's easy to use."
"With the appropriate governance framework, properly trained business analysts can be empowered to design and build business solutions themselves."
"Its cost is the most valuable. It is not as expensive. It is also easy to make different types of processes for the users."
"Process management is easy with Bizagi; validating processes and assigning resources is straightforward."
"The technical support is perfect."
"OutSystems' low-cost approach has positively impacted our productivity, because we were able to develop faster with OutSystems, enabling us to implement many changes during our sprint."
"Reduces the manual labor in compiling and deploying applications and generating procedural code (by reducing development bureaucracy/processes, resulting in real gains). The LifeTime Server approach, requiring just a few steps to publish applications in production environments, is fantastic."
"The product is mostly stable."
"You can go huge - so it is definitely a scalable solution."
"It is a stable solution, and the initial setup is straightforward."
"It is much easier to develop applications with the product’s IDE."
"I like the mobile features the most, and there are also various features around the portal we created that I enjoy."
"For the small business, this is very bad because it is still fragmented. The licensing policy should be more flexible and small company oriented. In micro-small companies, there should only be one or two. That's not the problem. Maybe it is too flexible, there are so many pieces that you need to put together. When you have a small business, it can be a little complicated, not so easy."
"I would like to see simulation as a free feature again. In version 3.3 it was free, but in 4.0 it isn't."
"Sometimes, when your process is big with multiple lanes, the product will freeze the issue noticed on multiple laptops, not a single PC."
"Its performance needs to be improved. The main thing is that it is limited, especially in terms of the response times. When the processes become a bit large, it is very awkward to work with the Bizagi modeler. When you have already modeled but start to rearrange, it is quite a bit of an effort to change the stuff. When you rearrange lanes or have new structures, it goes rather squiggly up and down and so on, which could be improved. The visual outputs of the DIREPs of the process models are pixelated and have a bad image quality. It is a PNG or JPEG, and you cannot export it as a PDF. When you have rather large processes, you should be able to arrange them hierarchically. Currently, it is not supported. If you use sub-processes and inflate a process, suddenly the arrangement is totally different, and although you know the process, you have to look where is it now. You need a good understanding of the levels of your processes before you start in Bizagi. It can have automatic support for optimal presentation. In BPM, you should have it from the top left to the bottom right. However, in most cases, people don't know how they should arrange it. Therefore, it would be nice to have a suggestion system for different arrangements to be able to better present the process."
"The product must make automation easier."
"It needs an easier setup for the Bizagi Engine."
"The performance could use improvement. We couldn't connect the processes to on one file. The performance is an issue for us."
"The solution is a bit heavy on resources and has slowed down my computer."
"The documentation needs to be more robust."
"Currently, in mobile applications, we don't have push notifications."
"The solution's testing framework needs to be improved, and the workflow should be slightly more mature."
"It needs improvement in the AI capability."
"It is hard to find the logic in OutSystems. From an improvement perspective, I want to be able to properly use logic in OutSystems."
"The product could be improved if there was a shortcut, or predefined, predictable templates provided."
"I would like to see OutSystems improve its integration capabilities, especially with emerging technologies like AI and GPT."
"I like the OutSystems platform. I am working on integrating it with another platform using APIs, however, it has proven to be difficult. The main issue I am facing is obtaining authorization tokens as well as access and refresh tokens. It may be due to my lack of knowledge of APIs as it is new to me."
Bizagi is ranked 10th in Low-Code Development Platforms with 78 reviews while OutSystems is ranked 2nd in Low-Code Development Platforms with 46 reviews. Bizagi is rated 8.4, while OutSystems is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Bizagi writes "A flexible, customizable solution that reduced time to market, but the UI and customer support could be better". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OutSystems writes "The visual program provides the advantage of only requiring one skill set for both the front and backend ". Bizagi is most compared with Camunda, Visio, Bonita, ARIS BPA and Apache Airflow, whereas OutSystems is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Appian, Mendix, ServiceNow and GitHub CoPilot. See our Bizagi vs. OutSystems report.
See our list of best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors and best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.
We monitor all Low-Code Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.