We performed a comparison between GitHub CoPilot and OutSystems based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Rapid Application Development Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The product's most valuable feature is vulnerability management features."
"GitHub CoPilot helps us auto-complete code. The tool's context awareness benefits our projects because it identifies the context in which we are working and automatically proposes solutions that we use."
"The most valuable aspects in terms of features, revolve around its code generation capabilities."
"The document generation features are valuable."
"Initially, OpenAI is free, but you'll need to pay for it later."
"The product is easy to integrate."
"The product's initial setup is straightforward because it's pushed through the updates."
"When I write code, I feel like I have someone sitting with me to help me. Wherever I'm stuck, I just ask a question, and it provides guidance that I can use."
"You can go huge - so it is definitely a scalable solution."
"It is a scalable solution...The initial setup of OutSystems is easy."
"I really like the one-click publish feature in OutSystems. In other development tools/languages, it's not as easy. I also like how easily I can manage all my projects in one place."
"The tool makes the development process easier."
"We can quickly develop an application using the tool."
"The drag-and-drop feature is very valuable."
"OutSystems' low-cost approach has positively impacted our productivity, because we were able to develop faster with OutSystems, enabling us to implement many changes during our sprint."
"There is literally a ton of stuff it can do. It's very flexible."
"The solution is expensive. It should also support other programming languages."
"There's room for improvement to ensure that suggestions align more precisely with the context of what I'm seeking, minimizing instances of unrelated or inaccurate code suggestions."
"GitHub CoPilot’s integration with other solutions could be improved."
"The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The tool needs to focus on integration, as it is the most important aspect. I would like to see some pre-designed modules included in my projects."
"In a few cases, the results aren't correct, so that needs improvement. Also, it would be great if the results could be presented in different formats, not just text. As engineers, it takes time to read through text-based results."
"Some of the suggestions provided by GitHub CoPilot are not accurate, making it an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The suggestions provided by the product must be improved."
"The product could be improved if there was a shortcut, or predefined, predictable templates provided."
"OutSystems does not provide any native reporting resources. All reports must be created with other tools or as a webpage."
"The latest version of the app generation tools could be more user-friendly."
"OutSystems could improve by being more like GitHub. It would be more helpful for us for division management and version control for our application."
"One of the biggest areas for improvement is that every time an existing data element is modified, it creates a new data element. It doesn't really modify that particular data element. So, a user has to follow an extra step of removing the existing data element and bringing in the new and modified data element that is being added, which sort of goes into negative productivity."
"The integration Studio could be improved. It needs a tool in which we could develop C# code and then integrate into OutSystems. The application could have a better UI."
"It's difficult to do the component version control. I would like them to add more studying materials."
"The dashboards in OutSystems could improve. There are a lot of tabs in the service center that can be confusing."
GitHub CoPilot is ranked 15th in Rapid Application Development Software with 11 reviews while OutSystems is ranked 3rd in Rapid Application Development Software with 46 reviews. GitHub CoPilot is rated 8.6, while OutSystems is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of GitHub CoPilot writes "Though it offers good integration features, the price needs to be lowered". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OutSystems writes "The visual program provides the advantage of only requiring one skill set for both the front and backend ". GitHub CoPilot is most compared with GitLab, Oracle Application Express (APEX), Pega BPM, ServiceNow and Adobe ColdFusion, whereas OutSystems is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Appian, Mendix, ServiceNow and SAP Mobile Platform. See our GitHub CoPilot vs. OutSystems report.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.