We performed a comparison between Camunda and ELMA 365 based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."The solution is useful for small projects."
"There's this graphic that tells you how many lines or how many tickets are in each step. In that way, you know where you stand. I find this feature very valuable."
"The architecture is good because it's a headless workflow. I can create my own frontend, and it's fully API-based."
"Having knowledge of the BPM and monitoring process has proven to be very beneficial, as I am currently engaged in documenting processes for Clientele."
"It's user friendly, much better than most tools I have seen."
"The most valuable feature of Camunda Platform is its Microservices architecture, which is easily integrable with APIs."
"I've found the active community most valuable but it also provides you with a lot of other features."
"The number of client implementations and cross-language capabilities to support multiple frameworks is very pluggable compared to Pega. It's also more portable."
"A lot of customers, when we introduce this kind of product into their organization, it provides a lot of analytics."
"When building interfaces, there are limited tools to work with, especially when dealing with different types of tasks, such as user tasks and system tasks."
"I would like to see better pricing."
"It has a Postgres database at the backend, and it is very difficult to scale if you increase the number of processes running. We did hit some barriers. We were able to overcome them, but it was a problem. Camunda has another product called Camunda Cloud, which supposedly doesn't have the same scalability problems, but we are not using Camunda Cloud because the set of features is smaller than Camunda On-Premises. So, its scalability can be improved. Because it has a single database, it is more difficult to scale if you have a huge success."
"The product does not have a dictionary."
"I would also like a very easy to use form builder."
"The solution could use some enhancements like adding connectors, improving forms and having a mobile app, but everything is an enhancement rather than a flaw."
"I would like to see the forms engine available in the open-source version of this solution."
"The initial setup can be complex for business users."
"Customers want improved productivity."
Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 71 reviews while ELMA 365 is ranked 45th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 1 review. Camunda is rated 8.2, while ELMA 365 is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ELMA 365 writes "A great ERP for medium and even small businesses". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas ELMA 365 is most compared with Bitrix24, WorkFusion and Bizagi.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
