We performed a comparison between Camunda and WorkflowGen based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Design solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The flexibility characteristic in a BPMS, through BPMN and DMN, is undoubtedly the most interesting feature for our business."
"The ease with which I can define workflows is most valuable. The latest updates and flexibility that it provides around a task activity are interesting for me."
"The most valuable feature is the scheduling."
", Camunda can be a powerful tool to work with when used in an optimized and well-implemented manner."
"Provides an easy way to integrate with the architectural environment."
"Using the BPMN helps us to have a common shared communication language when discussing processes."
"The headless nature of the Camunda Platform is something that has helped us to build our own logic and platforms on it."
"We are documenting all of the processors and VPN. Then we are sharing it with our business users."
"We use it a lot for creating workflows to transfer materials between plants, which is a signature part of what we do."
"Camunda Platform's customer support could be improved because their response is quite slow."
"The support offered by the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"There should be a multi-tenant solution for the platform where it supports multiple organizations on one platform instead of having to spin up multiple clusters for each organization. There should be an easy way to integrate different departments into one platform without having to operate multiple platforms. The operations should be easier with the enterprise solution. It should not create more overhead for the operations people."
"It would be better if the tool were made less reliant on Java."
"The solution's pricing and scalability could be improved."
"The support definitely can be improved. Apart from that, the language should be extendable to other platforms. If I want to write, I'll run a different platform, like Python code on top of it, or COBOL code on top of it, and it should support those languages."
"If Camunda could develop something that creates user forms that would be a great feature to have. They also need to improve the UI."
"I would like to have a feature for audit logging, audit logs and audit log management. And some history of use for the audit logs."
"This solution needs to be more customizable."
Earn 20 points
Camunda is ranked 2nd in Business Process Design with 71 reviews while WorkflowGen is ranked 29th in Business Process Design. Camunda is rated 8.2, while WorkflowGen is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WorkflowGen writes "Good for automatically triggering workflows, but needs to be more customizable". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas WorkflowGen is most compared with . See our Camunda vs. WorkflowGen report.
See our list of best Business Process Design vendors, best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors, and best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
