We performed a comparison between Celonis vs UiPath Process Mining based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Comparison Results: Both solutions are very comparable. Users share favorable ratings for both, although UiPath Process Mining is considered to be more affordable than the paid version of Celonis. UiPath may also be simpler to deploy.
"We can use it to discover processes and mitigate the mistakes in the process."
"The analyst role within this solution is very good; it provides a transaction dashboard, and KPI module, that are completely customizable."
"The product helps clients visualize potential savings by minimizing human errors and reducing manual work."
"The training material is good. The information is very systematic, detailed, and comprehensive. They have a training video for almost every single thing, which makes it easier to know how to use the tool."
"We use the tool for supply chain transformation. The tool has helped us find the bottlenecks in the supply chain like where the delay occurred in delivery, payment, etc. We had to extract two years' of data from the SAP system and an internal tool. We fed the data into Celonis and it created a process map for us with hundreds of variations. It has helped us see where exactly the bottleneck was. The tool has also helped us generate a lot of reviews and KPIs. It has helped us to find the problem and the remedy through process optimization."
"The process chart is valuable in identifying the bottlenecks."
"I like the spaghetti it throws off when configuring the sequence of processes and tracking the endpoint. I also like the variation from these defined processes and what is being observed on the ground. I'm exploring the root cause analysis a lot these days, and it seems to be quite interesting. But again, there are a lot of external dependencies on that. But I think the spaghetti, and the one that shows the variation and the performance gap, is something which I really like."
"We can observe the flow and invoices."
"There are other automation tools on the market but Uipath is the leader with many capabilities."
"I would rate the stability of UiPath Process Mining a nine out of ten."
"UiPath Process Mining's conformance feature allows us to upload our standard processes and compare how well our actual processes deviate from them."
"UiPath's human-in-the-loop features are helpful."
"The personal learning tools are good."
"UiPath's communication interface looks good."
"The visualization part, showing the number of cases processed successfully after a process is executed, is the most valuable. It also showed how effective a bot is after production. This kind of analysis that we got from UiPath Process Mining was good."
"This technology as a whole is really revolutionizing our finances."
"Celonis is a little more expensive than UiPath. Maybe they can work on making it less expensive."
"We would like this solution to be more flexible in how it interacts with other cloud-based database solutions, so that we can operate more seamlessly."
"Lacks a couple of algorithms that can better identify bottlenecks and provide a better view of them."
"The pricing policy is not affordable in Ukraine."
"One area for improvement is that, while Celonis has existing APIs for some domains like accounts, it lacks ready-made ones for others, like financial services. This means we need to customize our data channels so the data can be used by Celonis."
"The Process Query Language (PQL) native language used in Celonis needs improvements. It has most of the process-related functions but we have queries from clients that cannot be done in PQL."
"The solution needs to implement more automation aspects into the product. Right now, it's lacking."
"For example, we would like to see improvement of the simulation capabilities to include a BPMN-compliant modeler. That is, we would like to be able to connect the simulation to the BPMN modeler. I think it's one of the features that is missing in Celonis."
"The dashboard could be improved by allowing customization and they could introduce a Mac version of the solution."
"Setting up UiPath is relatively complex. It potentially involves multiple business units. First, you need to set up the connectors. If you want to analyze enterprise performance, you will have to do enterprise connectors, which means you must deal with different system owners, security, and things like that. That can get complicated."
"Document Understanding can read up to a certain amount of accuracy. While I understand that they have already started working to improve that accuracy right now, I think the accuracy is still only around 85-90%. I would call that our main problem with UiPath currently."
"UiPath Process Mining has a cloud-based version and doesn't have a desktop version like Celonis."
"Improvements could be made in educating a new support team for enhanced efficiency and effectiveness."
"I have observed that handling a large amount of logs slows down the solution's performance."
"Cost of the solution is high."
"When I used UiPath, there were no connectors to extract data from databases or data warehouses."
Celonis is ranked 1st in Process Mining with 44 reviews while UiPath Process Mining is ranked 2nd in Process Mining with 74 reviews. Celonis is rated 8.4, while UiPath Process Mining is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Celonis writes "Great process mining, process discovery, and opportunity identification". On the other hand, the top reviewer of UiPath Process Mining writes "A stable solution with a comparison feature that helps people to understand and visualize the impact of a particular task". Celonis is most compared with SAP Signavio Process Manager, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, Software AG ARIS Process Mining, Scout Platform and Minit, whereas UiPath Process Mining is most compared with SAP Signavio Process Manager, FortressIQ, ABBYY Timeline, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence and Minit. See our Celonis vs. UiPath Process Mining report.
See our list of best Process Mining vendors.
We monitor all Process Mining reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.