We performed a comparison between Check Point Harmony Endpoint and Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Additionally, when it comes to EDR, there are more tools available to assist with client work."
"It is stable and scalable."
"Fortinet FortiEDR's scalability is quite good, and you can add licenses to the solution."
"I like FortiClient EMS. FortiEDR has a lot of great features like lockdown mode, remote wipes, and encryption. I can set malware outbreak policies and controls for detecting abnormalities. You can also simulate phishing attacks."
"The stability is very good."
"The product's initial setup phase is very easy."
"The features that I have found most valuable are the ability to customize it and to reduce its size. It lets you run in a very small window in terms of memory and resources on legacy cash registers."
"Impressive detection capabilities"
"It's a scalable product as it is a cloud offering."
"The most valuable feature of Check Point Harmony Endpoint is centralized management."
"Its most valuable feature is being able to integrate cloud services and centralize the protection policy from a single administration dashboard."
"It offers complete endpoint protection for all assets."
"SandBlast Agent is always working in the background collecting sensitive data, forensics, and notifying users whenever there is a chance of a brute-force attack into our systems. Otherwise, it has been protecting our data at various geographies along with the endpoints that we set up on the cloud. They have been able to filter out or thwart any attacks from the very word, "Go," and make our work very safe and smooth."
"Its ability to rollback anti-ransomware once an attack has started is the most valuable feature."
"The security is its most valuable feature."
"It has extended OS support to ensure your legacy endpoints also have zero-day protection."
"It is a scalable solution...It is a stable solution."
"Version 14.0 comes with an SQL database, which gives great flexibility on control, reviewing logs, and viewing history."
"We particularly appreciate how scalable this solution is, as we often need to increase our end-user numbers."
"The solution does a good job of filtering and blocking unusual traffic."
"Kaspersky is easy to use, and it performs well."
"We've found the solution to be stable."
"Encryption is the most valuable feature. It creates an encryption tunnel from your location to the delivery address."
"Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert offers centralized monitoring where we can monitor everything from a single point. I also like its security and network traffic features."
More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert Pros →
"The solution is not user-friendly."
"The dashboard isn't easy to access and manage."
"ZTNA can improve latency."
"The EDR console should have more extensive reporting. You shouldn't need to purchase FortiAnalyzer. It should be included in the EDR part. The security adviser cloud platform could be improved with more options for exclusive or intensive rules for devices."
"They can include the automation for the realtime updates. We have a network infrastructure with remote sites. Whenever they send updates, they are not automated. We have to go into the console and push those updates. I wish it was more automated. The update file is currently around 31 MB. It could be smaller."
"Intelligence aspects need improvement"
"Detections could be improved."
"I haven't seen the use of AI in the solution."
"This is one of the most innovative solutions due to the fact that it includes many real-time content filtering features, management, and assurance of the transactions of what went in or out of our peripherals. That said, it is important to integrate other solutions to continue innovating in the market."
"I would like to see is this same solution being able to link with the services of different corporate networks as if they were a remote access VPN extension and thus not require additional licenses."
"The solution needs better reports and centralized logs."
"It would be ideal if they had a migration tool of some sort."
"Areas that have room for improvement are the scope of the product and, while I think the support is good, they can improve support as well."
"Check Point Harmony Endpoint's agent is a bit heavy."
"The management in Check Point Harmony Endpoint could be improved."
"Sometimes, with a lot of clients (1,000) the UI is a bit sluggish."
"Device control is lacking in EDR."
"It's not a simple implementation."
"The solution lacks DLP."
"Kaspersky needs to strengthen its standing in the market."
"The solution is expensive."
"There is a problem with the solution, it came from Russia and we are looking for a replacement."
"Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert needs to include a traffic interface."
"We'd like to see them improve the automatic response."
More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert Cons →
More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point Harmony Endpoint is ranked 8th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 105 reviews while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is ranked 18th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 44 reviews. Check Point Harmony Endpoint is rated 8.8, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Check Point Harmony Endpoint writes "Excellent anti-ransomware protection, zero-day phishing protection, and web browsing filtering". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert writes "Solid security and performance; overall a useful tool". Check Point Harmony Endpoint is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business and Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, whereas Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is most compared with Trend Vision One, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Cynet, IBM Security QRadar and OPTIMUS EDR. See our Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert report.
See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.