We performed a comparison between CylancePROTECT and ESET Endpoint Protection Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Fortinet has helped free up around 20 percent of our staff's time to help us out."
"NGAV and EDR features are outstanding."
"I like FortiClient EMS. FortiEDR has a lot of great features like lockdown mode, remote wipes, and encryption. I can set malware outbreak policies and controls for detecting abnormalities. You can also simulate phishing attacks."
"The ease of deployment and configuration is valuable. It's very easy compared to other vendors like Sophos. Sophos' configuration is complex. Fortinet is a lot easier to understand. You don't need a lot of admin knowledge to do the configuration."
"The setup is pretty simple."
"The most valuable feature is the analysis, because of the beta structure."
"The solution was relatively easy to deploy."
"The main thing is that I feel safe. Because the processes that have been used to get a handle on the attackers are much better than other competitors"
"It actively monitors the behavior and activity of processes and will, without hesitation, terminate at root anything it determines to be suspect."
"The solution’s AI is its most valuable feature."
"The Application Guard and ByteGuard are useful features."
"The deployment of updates is easy."
"It is extremely simple to manage and deploy."
"The most valuable feature of CylancePROTECT is the support."
"I've found the AI engine in CylancePROTECT to be particularly effective for technology and in preventing unknown threats."
"Its setup is simple if you have a Windows device; it is executable."
"Ransomware protection is embedded in the solution."
"The administration is its most valuable feature as I can see all versions in one place."
"The pricing is reasonable."
"The most valuable features of this solution are, of course, the IPS/IDS, Intrusion Prevention, Intrusion Detection, and Antivirus."
"I like the integration; it lets you see the product installed on a particular computer."
"It's light. I almost don't know that I am using it."
"There are some great features in ESET Endpoint Antivirus when you are browsing on the internet. For example, they have a notification if within your LAN network something is suspected to be a threat. Additionally, the malware features are very good."
"I feel the solution to be beneficial in respect of features that I cannot find with SSTM's."
"The SIEM could be improved."
"I would like the solution to extend beyond endpoint protection and include other attack surfaces such as other network components."
"The dashboard isn't easy to access and manage."
"I think cloud security and SASE are areas of concern in the product where improvements are required. The tool's cloud version has to be improved in terms of the security it offers."
"The solution is not stable."
"The solution is not user-friendly."
"Integration with Azure and SaaS provisioning tools could improve Fortinet FortiEDR."
"I haven't seen the use of AI in the solution."
"I would say one thing that they might need to bring in is protection for mobile devices."
"The initial deployment was quite complicated."
"Work on the math model. We are catching a lot of false positives, which gets to be a pain at the start of a deployment."
"CylancePROTECT's dashboard could be more user-friendly."
"An area for improvement in CylancePROTECT is its pricing, as it's a bit costly."
"The company that sells us the licenses sometimes doesn't know how to do certain things."
"The stability could be improved."
"If they can add more features on top of their Persona feature that would be ideal."
"When users renew licenses, they should offer a discount."
"A few times, we have had problems with downloading an agent. We had to try multiple times and multiple uploads."
"The update process can be improved, and there could be an automatic update process when a new version comes out. For system updates or program updates, there could be more automation."
"I think that ESET is a little too heavy on the CPU."
"We would like to see more options in the help menu for users."
"There are other features you can add on to help make the security stronger, however, they should offer better security even on a basic level."
"The migration between on-prem and cloud has room for improvement."
"It would be useful if they could automate the deployment more."
More ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
CylancePROTECT is ranked 23rd in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 41 reviews while ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is ranked 9th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 99 reviews. CylancePROTECT is rated 8.0, while ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of CylancePROTECT writes "Ensures advanced AI-driven threat detection to provide robust endpoint security, effectively preventing both known and unknown threats with minimal impact on system performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ESET Endpoint Protection Platform writes "Easy to set up with good security and rapidly improving capabilities". CylancePROTECT is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and Symantec Endpoint Security, whereas ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business, CrowdStrike Falcon, SentinelOne Singularity Complete and Check Point Harmony Endpoint. See our CylancePROTECT vs. ESET Endpoint Protection Platform report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.