We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiSandbox and Proofpoint Email Protection based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Palo Alto Networks, ESET and others in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)."Overall, it works fine. Its interface is also fine."
"The technical support is very good."
"The most valuable feature is the protection and the way it works, the technology is what I like the most."
"What I find most valuable, is that it is easy to use."
"You have access to a report as to what behaviors the example file entered in the registry."
"The scanner office document as well as PDF are useful. The most valuable thing is that you can emulate different operating systems without having the danger of getting something infected. It emulates several operating systems, and as a result, you either get the file or you don't get the file."
"The analysis engine is a very valuable feature."
"Fortinet FortiSandbox is scalable."
"As a cloud-based product, it can scale well."
"The stability is very good."
"URL scanning and online relay service are the most valuable features of Proofpoint Email Protection."
"Provides better control over emails, especially those sent via Office 365 on the cloud."
"Its anti-phishing functionality is the most valuable. Certainly, the biggest problem I have is phishing."
"It was easy to set up."
"The solution scales quite well."
"The setup was easy."
"Something that needs to improve, is the end-point protection."
"The response time from technical support should be improved."
"If you were to compare prices between vendors and manufacturers, you would see that the lowest equipment in the Sandbox line is quite expensive for a new customer."
"The integration is limited. The solution needs to offer better integration with multiple vendors."
"When you reach the maximum capacity, you cannot upgrade the solution because its hardware is very expensive."
"In the next release, I would like to see machine learning and anti-exploitation included."
"In future releases, I would like to see more automation capabilities."
"I would like to have machine learning added to the solution in a future release."
"Unfortunately, the whole product is going downhill right now, ever since they were sold to Thoma Bravo. We're constantly having problems with stability and the product in general."
"Proofpoint Email Protection's interface is confusing and could be improved."
"The flexibility of the solution can be improved."
"The solution should add post-sales training."
"I would want better spear phishing protection in the essentials package."
"Proofpoint has a lot of false alarms."
"The incident reporting on offer needs to be improved. It's lacking right now. It should be on the platform somewhere."
"They do not have an on-demand scan for the internal viruses and internal users, and they don't have a scan for the exchange server against viruses and spam as Symantec does."
Fortinet FortiSandbox is ranked 5th in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) with 36 reviews while Proofpoint Email Protection is ranked 1st in Secure Email Gateway (SEG) with 46 reviews. Fortinet FortiSandbox is rated 8.2, while Proofpoint Email Protection is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiSandbox writes "Light and powerful solution design; useful to have". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Proofpoint Email Protection writes "A reasonably priced product that offers protection to emails, along with spam filters". Fortinet FortiSandbox is most compared with Palo Alto Networks WildFire, Trellix Network Detection and Response, Check Point SandBlast Network, Microsoft Defender for Office 365 and Fortinet FortiEDR, whereas Proofpoint Email Protection is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP), Palo Alto Networks WildFire, Cisco Secure Email and Fortinet FortiMail.
We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.