We performed a comparison between IBM Maximo and nlyte based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, IFS, Infor and others in Enterprise Asset Management (EAM)."The most valuable features of IBM Maximo are the overall power and interface, and there are a lot of different modules that we use that are helpful. Additionally, it's an integrated solution and it has a lot of capabilities."
"It is configurable, where you can add extra fields to screens and to the database."
"I have found Work Order management the most valuable feature. Additionally, it is a very robust and powerful solution."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to correct maintenance."
"Has a powerful audit combination that helps achieve high accuracy."
"The incident management feature is good because it allows you to keep track of and classify issues."
"The most valuable feature is asset management maintenance as well as asset management overall."
"They have a real strength of tracking the asset itself along with the condition of the asset, the maintenance of the asset and who has access to the asset, etc."
"The power management aspect of nlyte provides a comprehensive overview of power consumption and forecasting capabilities. It allows for strategic planning, such as assessing the impact of adding new racks with specific power requirements. This feature facilitates considerations not only for power consumption but also for thermal aspects, including airflow dynamics between hot and cold aisles. In essence, the most advantageous feature of nlyte sfor us lies in its power management capabilities."
"The latest version is slow due to the power it requires."
"IBM Maximo can improve the financial support and financial application, to make it more similar to an ERP as opposed to an EAM. Overall they can improve the financial processes."
"Vendor management needs enhancement."
"There are always ways to improve and make things better."
"The initial setup was complex, because it is a complex product."
"Initial setup is a longer process because Maximo is bigger and has more processes."
"Could use some alignment regarding some standards and the tracking of the IT assets. Even though they have all of the information (i.e. where are the assets, who owns the asset, etc.), they were not mapping it to different cyber standards."
"It's not user-friendly. It could use shortcuts for frequently requested services."
"Nylte is quite intricate to use. Training someone to navigate the platform would likely require a substantial investment, ranging from one to two months for basic proficiency, followed by an additional two to three months of consistent use to gain full proficiency. Despite its complexity, I believe there is room for simplification, making it more user-friendly. While there have been improvements, there is potential for further enhancements in this area."
IBM Maximo is ranked 1st in Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) with 23 reviews while nlyte is ranked 10th in Data Center Infrastructure Management with 1 review. IBM Maximo is rated 8.0, while nlyte is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of IBM Maximo writes "Work order management and scalability enables the businesses' needs to be met". On the other hand, the top reviewer of nlyte writes "A Software Solution synchronizing information and activities to other systems that depend on accurate physical infrastructure information". IBM Maximo is most compared with ServiceNow, JIRA Service Management, ABB Ability Asset Suite EAM, IFS Cloud Platform and NetSuite ERP, whereas nlyte is most compared with Schneider Electric EcoStruxure IT, Device42 and Sunbird DCIM.
We monitor all Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.