We performed a comparison between IBM Rational DOORS and PTC Integrity Requirements Connector based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Atlassian, Siemens and others in Application Requirements Management."What I like about DOORS is baselines, it's easy and I use the capability of multiple users. The traceability or links between different levels are very nice. Additionally, it is used by all of our suppliers, which brings us commonality."
"The next-generation features are good."
"Compared to other tools that I have used over the past 20 years, DOORS is the best of the best."
"I like the way we can simply link requirements with one another and with test descriptions and then automatically produce reports that are required to show compliance to our customers. It is a combination of requirements management and reporting that I like, but I really have very little to do with the reporting part of it. I don't know how easy or hard it is to create those reports."
"Traceability on requirements for a huge project in an organization is a big gain."
"The traceability matrix in DOORS improved our project outcomes. It helps ensure coverage of requirements at different levels, from user requirements to software requirements to test requirements."
"It is very customizable and easy to scale."
"We have different generations of all products. It lets us select and see unique attributes for each release or generation. You can use attributes to define a selection area to see which equipments are for the old versions and which ones are for the new versions. This inbuilt view is what I like in IBM Rational DOORS. So, for a database and a set of requirements, it will select and show unique attributes for a release or a generation."
"It is a stable solution...I rate the support a nine out of ten."
"It could be more user-friendly. It's not a beautiful tool. The user interface is gray. It has only lists inside, and it's horrible when you want to add tables. It's tough to add tables and manage them. It also becomes difficult when you want to add images."
"I think there is probably room to improve by offering free training."
"IBM should integrate some solutions they already own toenhance the utility of the product further. Specifically import and export to Office products is more difficult than it needs to be."
"There are problems with communicating between DOORS and Microsoft Office."
"Both the performance and the price could be improved."
"Overall, the user experience should be enhanced."
"It's difficult to set the code on the solution."
"I would like to see them improve in agile management the Scrum/Kanban Board to work with overseas team members."
"The training material for PTC Integrity should be made a little bit easier or more useful for the user."
IBM Rational DOORS is ranked 1st in Application Requirements Management with 51 reviews while PTC Integrity Requirements Connector is ranked 6th in Application Requirements Management with 1 review. IBM Rational DOORS is rated 8.0, while PTC Integrity Requirements Connector is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM Rational DOORS writes " Offers ability to automate tasks and to track changes within documents and compare different versions of requirements but modeling capabilities could benefit from a web-based tool ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PTC Integrity Requirements Connector writes "A requirement management tool that provides a good technical support along with stability". IBM Rational DOORS is most compared with Polarion Requirements, Jira, Jama Connect, Helix ALM and 3SL Cradle, whereas PTC Integrity Requirements Connector is most compared with Jira and IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation.
See our list of best Application Requirements Management vendors.
We monitor all Application Requirements Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.