We performed a comparison between Imanami GroupID and SailPoint IdentityIQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two User Provisioning Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I have found the overall features to be useful."
"For each job code, we go through and determine the access they're supposed to have to the system. Based on that job code, we use the query tool and say that anybody who is in this job code gets these groups added to them, or conversely, if they change job codes, it removes the ones that they shouldn't have and adds the one they should. That runs every night, and the next day, everybody has the job codes they're supposed to have."
"Imanami GroupID's UI is good."
"I like IdentityIQ's granular attachment management and certification customization features."
"The solution is one of the main security products you need to control access and have visibility into what's happening in your organization. It helps with managing access to applications, ensuring governance, and obtaining certifications."
"We like the integration with other systems."
"The most selling modules for SailPoint are the compliance manager and the life cycle manager."
"Provisioning in multiple environments."
"One of the most valuable aspects of SailPoint is its open integration interface."
"The most valuable feature for our customers and for us is the identity data warehouse."
"The solution is very good at the management of the identity lifecycle."
"The mobile application needs to be improved and there should be chatbox features to allow users to easily reach out for assistance."
"The product's implementation is complex. It should also work on GPO."
"I'd like to see a better user interface. It works, but it is clunky. There should be better import and export of LDAP queries and better management tools."
"The connectors are far too manual. This needs to be automated a bit."
"Needs to focus on automation wherein provisioning of work can be improved and access certification should be automated without the intervention from a manager for approval."
"I would like to see more Cloud management from this product."
"There is a need for further enhancements, specifically in the multifactor authentication capabilities."
"Competitors are advancing by offering integrated solutions encompassing access and privileged access management in a single unified platform. IdentityIQ's focus has remained primarily on identity and access governance, neglecting to expand its offerings to include these additional functionalities within its existing product. Enhancing their product by incorporating modules for access management, privileged access management, and third-party access governance could address this gap."
"The user interface is not very user-friendly."
"When it comes to queries and analysis, I find the reporting module to be very low, very simple."
"The advanced provisioning features require more improvement."
Imanami GroupID is ranked 10th in User Provisioning Software with 3 reviews while SailPoint IdentityIQ is ranked 1st in User Provisioning Software with 61 reviews. Imanami GroupID is rated 8.4, while SailPoint IdentityIQ is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Imanami GroupID writes "Simplifies the task of managing groups and is affordable and easy to implement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SailPoint IdentityIQ writes "Flexible, easy to customize, and not too difficult to set up". Imanami GroupID is most compared with Netwrix Auditor and ManageEngine ADManager Plus, whereas SailPoint IdentityIQ is most compared with Saviynt, One Identity Manager, Microsoft Entra ID, ForgeRock and Microsoft Identity Manager. See our Imanami GroupID vs. SailPoint IdentityIQ report.
See our list of best User Provisioning Software vendors and best Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) vendors.
We monitor all User Provisioning Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.