We performed a comparison between Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business and SentinelOne based on our users’ reviews in four categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Comparison Results: Based on our users’ reviews, SentinelOne is a stronger, more secure solution. SentinelOne offers a deeper and more robust level of security. Additionally, SentinelOne provides consistent protection across Windows, Linux, and macOS. It can also support legacy infrastructures as well as many newer environments. The single-pane feature helps protect numerous endpoints with a lean team, saving time and money and improving TCO and ROI. Users are also happier with SentinelOne’s pricing.
"It is very easy to set up. I would rate my experience with the initial setup a ten out of ten, with ten being very easy to set up."
"The stability is very good."
"The solution was relatively easy to deploy."
"The features that I have found most valuable are the ability to customize it and to reduce its size. It lets you run in a very small window in terms of memory and resources on legacy cash registers."
"he solution is an anti-malware product that integrates well with other vendor products such as firewalls, SIEM, etc. It captures threat intelligence and gives you better visibility. The product also has sandboxing features."
"This is stable and scalable."
"The main thing is that I feel safe. Because the processes that have been used to get a handle on the attackers are much better than other competitors"
"Additionally, when it comes to EDR, there are more tools available to assist with client work."
"We found the installation to be very straightforward and the deployment process to be very fast."
"One of the main features of this solution is the fast scanning capabilities."
"Overall, the product is quite flexible."
"I like how it protects the network and all the endpoints."
"The solution provides protection for all our systems, file servers, endpoints and domain controllers."
"Antivirus, including anti-spam, trojan, and worm detection and prevention. Kaspersky has a comprehensive virus definition update which is very helpful for threat prevention."
"The product is fairly technologically advanced and near the top of the market right now."
"The most valuable feature is the central view. With this view, I can see all of the data."
"The strength of SentinelOne is that it has an automated, active EDR. It does that first level of what a SOC analyst would do, automatically, using artificial intelligence, so we can focus on other things. Active EDR not only notifies you, but it actually fixes that first level. That is unheard of. Very few, if any, companies do that."
"It is easy to manage and install. It has a very nice graphical interface that is very intuitive when end users are using it. You don't have to follow or read a book about 600 pages to have knowledge on how to use it. When SentinelOne is up and running, you can easily find your way."
"It has helped to reduce our organizational risks."
"SentinelOne’s Rollback is its best feature."
"I like the centralized management with the web dashboard."
"SentinelOne has helped us to improve our security by fine-tuning our current use cases and creating new ones."
"The ability to quickly and easily identify threats on our machines is valuable. The fact that it protects the environment as a whole is also valuable. They have the ability to identify network nodes, and they have Ranger as a component of the solution that allows us to see the whole picture. We can see on what we have SentinelOne and on what we do not."
"The alerting features are the most valuable. We know that when something goes wrong, we get alerted instantly. That gives us a leg up. Even before the user knows what's happening, we're being alerted to step in and stop anything catastrophic from happening."
"I haven't seen the use of AI in the solution."
"Once, we had an event that was locked and blocked, but information about it came to us two or three days later."
"Detections could be improved."
"Cannot be used on mobile devices with a secure connection."
"The solution should address emerging threats like SQL injection."
"There's room for improvement in the quick response time and technical support for integration issues, especially when dealing with multiple vendors."
"The solution is not user-friendly."
"We've had a lot of false positives; things incorrectly flagged that require manual configuration to allow. Even worse, after we allow a legitimate program, it sometimes gets flagged again after an update. This has caused a lot of extra work for my team."
"I'd like Kaspersky to be more stable and secure."
"It would be great if, as an additional feature, you could download updates without deploying updates to end users."
"It would be nice if it was less expensive."
"Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business should improve its reporting. There are also some issues in the cloud portal. The solution's pricing can be cheaper."
"There were issues with the cloud management."
"The performance is not very good."
"The reports aren't so good. To make it a perfect ten they should improve the reports and web interface."
"It slows down the system sometimes, and it has the occasional false positive where it deems something a virus when it isn't."
"Deployment strategy for large organizations that do not use active directory (AD)."
"Email security should also integrate with it to get more visibility on it."
"One area of SentinelOne that definitely has room for improvement is the reporting. The canned reports are clunky and we haven't been able to pull a lot of good information directly from them."
"I really haven't done enough to really see any improvements."
"In terms of improvement, I would like to see better alerting to let us know if there is anything wrong with SentinelOne working on the endpoint of the computer."
"Communication and documentation could be improved."
"The most difficult part of using Singularity Complete is logging in, as they often update the management console."
"The training for SentinelOne Singularity should be free. The solution has a lot of features but we do not know how to use them all. The moment someone purchases the solution they should contact them and provide them with a feature session on how to use the features."
More Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business Pricing and Cost Advice →
More SentinelOne Singularity Complete Pricing and Cost Advice →
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is ranked 11th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 111 reviews while SentinelOne Singularity Complete is ranked 2nd in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 177 reviews. Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is rated 8.0, while SentinelOne Singularity Complete is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business writes "Easy to setup, stable and good security use cases". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SentinelOne Singularity Complete writes "Provides peace of mind and is good at ingesting data and correlating". Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Fortinet FortiClient, CrowdStrike Falcon, ESET Endpoint Protection Platform and Trend Vision One Endpoint Security, whereas SentinelOne Singularity Complete is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Darktrace, CrowdStrike Falcon, ThreatLocker Protect and Check Point Harmony Endpoint. See our Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs. SentinelOne Singularity Complete report.
See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors and best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.