We performed a comparison between LambdaTest and Visual Studio Test Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Functional Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Stability-wise, I have not experienced any downtime or other performance issues."
"The real devices feature is the most valuable feature for us."
"The most valuable feature is the real-time testing, which helps you to test your website on more than two thousand combinations of browsers and operating systems."
"LambdaTest offers geolocation testing in automation, which is amazing!"
"LambdaTest is easy to use, and the documentation provides all the needed information."
"Our test execution time was reduced to 16 mins from five hours when executed in parallel on multiple VMs. This has been extremely helpful!"
"The solution is very easy to understand and has a user-friendly UI."
"The UI is pretty clean and easy to navigate, and we were able to figure it out very quickly."
"Easy to use and easily scalable."
"The interface is easy to use."
"The debugging feature is valuable."
"The most valuable features are the SSIS reports, the deployment models, and the ability to interact with other Microsoft tools."
"The setup is easy and straightforward."
"We are satisfied with technical support. Communicating with them is very simple. We also have a lot of online resources to check and to study and to train our team with. The documentation is very clear and readily available."
"Code testing is the most valuable feature of this solution for developing software."
"What I like most about Visual Studio Test Professional is the way people publish templates and publish integration."
"It would be nice to have an API for visual regression testing."
"Their smart testing module needs improvement."
"Mobile application testing will be an added benefit for us if LambdaTest implements this really soon."
"If possible to simulate the finger pinch, it would make it more realistic."
"LambdaTest needs to have native application testing, which would be a great help to my team."
"Sometimes, when multiple users use the tool simultaneously, it can slow down, affecting efficiency."
"Load flow compared to other stacks needs improvement."
"Improvements on a platform need to happen on a timely basis...There should be some new features coming up or some performance improvisation over a period of time."
"Visual Studio Test Professional is a little pricey."
"The solution’s stability could be improved."
"The product must provide more integration."
"There are too many features with the product and I would like there to be less."
"I would like to see more integration in the solution."
"Visual Studio Test Professional could improve by having better integration with external databases."
"In Visual Studio we still don't have anything which can pinpoint memory leaks on a certain code line."
"Sometimes, the solution hangs, so its performance could be improved."
More Visual Studio Test Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
LambdaTest is ranked 14th in Functional Testing Tools with 22 reviews while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 6th in Functional Testing Tools with 48 reviews. LambdaTest is rated 8.8, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of LambdaTest writes "Technical support should be improved, though it has great documentation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Customization is a key feature as is the ability to integrate with third-party services ". LambdaTest is most compared with BrowserStack, Sauce Labs, Tricentis Tosca, Katalon Studio and Perfecto, whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with TFS, Apache JMeter, Tricentis NeoLoad, SmartBear TestComplete and Tricentis Tosca. See our LambdaTest vs. Visual Studio Test Professional report.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.