We performed a comparison between LogMeIn Central and Microsoft Configuration Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about NinjaOne, Kaseya, TeamViewer and others in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)."The initial setup was simple."
"Using the product, we provide a quicker response when supporting customers."
"It’s enabled me to remotely do updates to servers and workstations in off-hours – without needing to travel into the office. Makes my life much easier."
"I like the security aspect, that I can glance down and see quickly who's up to date on patches, and who has virus concerns."
"I would not want to tell other companies about it because it is so powerful, it does so much, and it makes me look so good."
"Provides remote access, allows me to get inside our network to be able to fix problems."
"No issues with stability. It has worked on every platform I’ve tried it on, and not interfered with anything."
"The initial setup was very easy."
"This solution has made life easy with respect to patching, compliance, and OSD."
"Offers good patching."
"There have to be made some improvement in WSUS and control in other non-Microsoft products updates."
"The initial setup is fairly straightforward."
"Endpoint Manager is valuable to our organization because it allows us to connect to our enterprise from remote locations securely. The most useful feature is its robustness and scalability. It is highly scalable and flexible, allowing us to use it in various environments. Additionally, we can specialize the policies related to each device group. This ensures that each group has access to the applications they need for their work and non-work hours."
"Automation of operating system, application, and update deployments massively reduces IT operations effort."
"Microsoft Configuration Manager gives different tools in one solution."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager is it's incredibly simple to configure and execute changes in bulk, allowing for seamless deployment. With this solution, you can easily track the status of all modifications and send them with ease, making it a comprehensive and efficient solution for any necessary adjustments."
"They should provide intermediate device limit options for the users."
"File transfer on the free version needs improvement. Allow file transfer with drag and drop to and from Remote Desktop. "
"The initial load is terribly slow and often has delays with the login page loading."
"The screen. Make it clearer. The screen resolutions don't always line up. So clarity of the screen, and speed."
"It needs backwards compatibility for non-Microsoft-supported operating systems, for example, XP and 2003. In situations where I have no options but to run older operating systems, I would like for it to be backwards compatible."
"Sometimes it just fails to load."
"The solution is expensive as hell."
"Do not use the technical support."
"There is a reboot issue with the patching. Sometimes, if patching runs into any issue whatsoever, it doesn't reboot but it doesn't tell you it errored out. It just sits there and we don't find out until the next day whether it patched or not. That was a big issue for us. We're working through that. They added some stuff in there now where you can actually tell reboot is pending. But we still need some kind of notification that if something fails or is pending, we know. We shouldn't have to go in and look. They don't have anything for that right now."
"There should probably be better remote support. They should also continue to improve on patch management, patching, and creating or turning products in software into deployable apps."
"The tool's deployment can be cumbersome."
"The main thing is that SCCM has to become an appliance instead of a server. When I say appliance, it has to come preconfigured so that it is drop-shipped into the enterprise and then you activate the feature sets that you want. It should pull down all the latest binaries. Once that is all there, it should have a discovery tool which goes out and discovers the assets within an enterprise. If the server, workstation, and applications are all coming from the same vendor, why not have the vendor do this work for us and automate it as much as it possibly can?"
"In terms of the monitoring, the timeframe it takes to actually report back on the compliance of a device after it has been patched is a bit too long."
"The main room for improvement is the on-screen display. I think it would be good if some improvements were made."
"Could do with some cosmetic improvements on the user interface."
"I currently need to increase my compliance level in the patching processes which this solution could improve on."
More Microsoft Configuration Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
LogMeIn Central is ranked 10th in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) with 19 reviews while Microsoft Configuration Manager is ranked 2nd in Server Monitoring with 78 reviews. LogMeIn Central is rated 8.6, while Microsoft Configuration Manager is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of LogMeIn Central writes "Fast with an easy setup and a good interface". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Configuration Manager writes "Affordable, easy to use, and easy to understand". LogMeIn Central is most compared with TeamViewer, NinjaOne, Atera, Kaseya VSA and LogMeIn Rescue, whereas Microsoft Configuration Manager is most compared with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, BigFix, Tanium and Microsoft Intune.
We monitor all Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.