We performed a comparison between MEGA HOPEX and Pega BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about LeanIX, Sparx Systems, erwin by Quest and others in Enterprise Architecture Management."I find the IT portfolio management very valuable and helpful."
"We use the portfolio management feature heavily."
"The most valuable feature is that the software controls everything from a single management window."
"This is a complete package with all of the functionality that we need."
"It is very interactive."
"The main feature I find crucial in MEGA HOPEX is the catalog view, which provides a comprehensive visualization of all artifacts in one repository. Another valuable aspect is the availability of out-of-the-box outcomes, such as strategy maps and BPA models, eliminating the need for additional configuration. MEGA HOPEX allows users to focus on specific business areas, like risk management or data governance, providing a high-level overview while enabling deep dives into specific areas of interest. For risk management, MEGA HOPEX allows users to assess impacts, create recovery plans, and track action plans."
"The dashboard on the homepage makes for an enhanced view at a glance of the various work functions applicable to the user."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the reuse of common enterprise components and entities."
"Pega BPM has a full suite for any enterprise. It is a process orchestration platform. It has detailed features for case management and workflows."
"The most valuable feature of Pega BPM is its architecture."
"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the various workflows."
"The interface is quite simple and easy to use, even for beginners."
"It is quite configurable, which is the most exciting feature. We can easily configure it as per our needs."
"Pega BPM's most valuable feature is the use of CDX to solve problems."
"The solution provides us with a very good dashboard."
"Can do a lot of things with minimum time and cost."
"The initial setup is a little complex."
"The tool's UI should be more user-friendly."
"The initial setup can be quite complex at first."
"This product is expensive and would be improved by lowering its price."
"We would like to see integration with other products, such as being able to use our workflow with SharePoint and Microsoft Office."
"MEGA HOPEX's initial setup could be easier. The newer version is better but they still need to improve the process. The deployment took approximately four to eight hours."
"Better documentation and training would be helpful."
"They do tend to push people to their professional services, instead of helping the customers with their problems. I understand this is their business. At the same time, however, they need to work on fact sheets or offer some program to help the customers who want to implement it themselves and to make it run properly in their environment."
"Business specific functionality is needed."
"Pega is claiming they're into low code but as per Gartner Magic Quadrant, Pega is not there now."
"I think there is room for improvement in the low code/ no code environment that they're promoting now. That needs to be aligned a little bit more. I still feel that it is not that friendly for a person who has no experience with Pega to just go in and try to create something."
"The cost of licensing could be improved."
"From a technical point of view, it would be helpful to have some advanced analytics to help with configuration. We have a lot of unwanted features and it would be good to configure it more appropriately so that we are using just exactly what we need."
"An area for improvement in Pega BPM is security. It's secure, but it still has a lot of vulnerabilities. Pega BPM is robust, but it still needs some improvement performance-wise."
"UI needs improvement."
"The training aspect of Pega BPM requires significant enhancement. There should be more opportunities for third-party training and engaging events, such as hackathons where individuals can share their expertise. Additionally, the training structure itself should be more organized, as I have received feedback from my colleagues in the COE that the current training approach is overwhelming and requires excessive referencing to obtain accurate information. Another area for improvement would be the user experience with regard to RPA. Simplifying the IDA for citizen developers would make it easier for them to adopt the RPA tool."
MEGA HOPEX is ranked 4th in Enterprise Architecture Management with 37 reviews while Pega BPM is ranked 3rd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 57 reviews. MEGA HOPEX is rated 7.8, while Pega BPM is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of MEGA HOPEX writes "Interactive with good functionality and helps with productivity". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pega BPM writes "Provides built-in frameworks that can be reused and reduces time and cost". MEGA HOPEX is most compared with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, LeanIX, ARIS BPA, Visio and Avolution ABACUS, whereas Pega BPM is most compared with ServiceNow, Camunda, Appian, IBM BPM and Microsoft Power Apps.
We monitor all Enterprise Architecture Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
