We performed a comparison between Microsoft .NET Framework and Oracle SOA Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Infrastructure solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of Microsoft .NET Framework is debugging."
"I'd rate the solution as highly stable."
"The new .NET Core has those middlewares, which are awesome from a security standpoint. With the old Framework or the newer Framework, middleware is basically an event pipeline. You configure and register it, and it handles things centrally. A simple example is logging. With the old Framework, you needed to try/catch blocks everywhere. Here, you configure the logging handler once, and it captures exceptions across the application. I really like the middleware pattern."
"Ease of use, the richness of the libraries and basically very good development tools."
"The .NET Framework is a very good framework. It does what I need it to do."
"It facilitated the streamlined scheduling process by amalgamating inputs from various sources, including location data and other systems."
"The solution's technical support is very good...The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"Microsoft .NET Framework continually innovates, particularly in Visual Studio, which focuses on improving languages, debugging, and .NET functionality."
"In case there is something that doesn't work out of the box, you have the flexibility to customize it."
"Enables our Product Manager to post products to different outside EC platforms with only one interface and one process."
"The most valuable feature of the facility, as the partner link, is to try to use third-party services and logic in your own vehicle to orchestrate the information."
"Valuable features include connectors and BAM."
"The ability to stand up a highly available SOA Suite, which has full DR capabilities, in a remote center and synchronize the databases using Data Guard."
"This is one of the critical products for my company and we use it extensively. We currently use each and every feature of Oracle SOA."
"The most valuable feature of Oracle SOA Suite is all the platform's capabilities."
"What I like best about Oracle SOA Suite is Oracle support. I also like the tool features, especially the integration feature."
"The learning curve could be improved."
"They should try to improve their Blazor WebAssembly."
"The solution is difficult to learn if someone is learning it for the first time."
"If AI could be incorporated in Microsoft .NET Framework it would be helpful."
"The integration with DevOps tools, such as Azure DevOps, Jira, and GitLab, would be a valuable addition."
"The integration capability of the product with AI is an area with certain shortcomings, where improvements are required."
"Lacking in auto-scaling."
"The pricing is a bit expensive."
"The Maven integration in JDeveloper is very basic and might be enhanced to allow the proper use of Maven."
"An important area that can be improved is the product's data monitoring. When we use the solution for interfacing or end-to-end data monitoring, we want to know exactly where the data is going and exactly where it is failing, or where there is an issue."
"If the disk space expansion can be made more flexible, not requiring a database restart, it would be a major benefit."
"Decrease the number of internal resources which the product uses."
"Another area of improvement is performance. Because with multiple solutions connecting to the SOA platform, the performance of the SOA platform can be affected in time. So, that could be one area that could be improved with the SOA."
"They supply lots of documentation but finding what we need is challenging at times."
"An area for improvement in Oracle SOA Suite is the cost. It could be lower."
"Other solutions might be better componets such as Salesforce."
Microsoft .NET Framework is ranked 4th in Application Infrastructure with 47 reviews while Oracle SOA Suite is ranked 8th in Application Infrastructure with 65 reviews. Microsoft .NET Framework is rated 8.4, while Oracle SOA Suite is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft .NET Framework writes "Intuitive, easier to develop, maintain, and migrate from the old framework to newer versions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle SOA Suite writes "Easy to setup, provides good support and scalable solution ". Microsoft .NET Framework is most compared with IIS, Magic xpa Application Platform, JBoss Enterprise Application Platform, Apache Web Server and Uniface, whereas Oracle SOA Suite is most compared with Mule ESB, WebLogic Suite, Apache Web Server, TIBCO ActiveMatrix and IBM BPM. See our Microsoft .NET Framework vs. Oracle SOA Suite report.
See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.