We performed a comparison between Microsoft Power Apps and Pillir based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Rapid Application Development Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is the compatibility with other Microsoft components."
"It is stable and reliable."
"Flexibility, easy setup, and fairly quick results are valuable features of the product."
"It is easy to use."
"For our purposes, it is quite scalable."
"The flows are good because they can be used in a variety of situations."
"The platform has valuable features for opportunity and finance management. It has all the essential features for customer service."
"It is easy to design automation processes."
"I love how they took the MIT Scratch concept and implemented it into the in-app backend. It makes the app creation so much more intuitive and easy to use."
"I believe that this is the only product in the market that truly supports offline capabilities in an SAP environment."
"There is room for improvement in error handling and debugging."
"The area where this product can be improved is the documentation. When we get stuck it's with the documentation when we are not able to find the codes we need."
"The flexibility and the user interface need improvement."
"It would be beneficial to have a feature that allows users to split the opportunity into separate logs for each product."
"PowerApps can't do a lot of things that users need now. For example, it can't handle signatures."
"We're not in production yet, so we're still working through some issues."
"The product could be improved by making it a production application and enabling the export of apps."
"The price could be lower."
"The modernizer element should convert a higher percentage of the ABAP code, moving it from approximately 75%, closer to 100%."
"While we're not in a place of letting LOB analysts build apps, at some point, we may want to give them a bit more freedom - as long as we can limit their ability to harm the ERP data. I would like to see more tools pertaining to this area."
Earn 20 points
Microsoft Power Apps is ranked 1st in Rapid Application Development Software with 77 reviews while Pillir is ranked 42nd in Rapid Application Development Software. Microsoft Power Apps is rated 7.8, while Pillir is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Power Apps writes "Low-code, low learning curve, and reduces manpower". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pillir writes "Helpful dashboard, supports offline capabilities for SAP, professional support, and a simple pricing model". Microsoft Power Apps is most compared with Oracle Application Express (APEX), Mendix, ServiceNow, Appian and Microsoft Azure App Service, whereas Pillir is most compared with . See our Microsoft Power Apps vs. Pillir report.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.