We performed a comparison between Microsoft Power Apps and Temenos Quantum based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Rapid Application Development Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is the simple data connectivity components."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft PowerApps is the user interface."
"The most valuable features are low-code and fast development."
"Power Automate has been the most valuable feature."
"I like how fast I can develop an application and put it in production with PowerApps. I think the integration is also excellent. The platforms is growing, so they are constantly adding more connectors on all these things."
"The features I find the most valuable are the 365 and Microsoft applications integrations and the automation."
"The most valuable feature is that PowerApps can be used by most business users. It is not only for programmers."
"The flows are good because they can be used in a variety of situations."
"The visualizer and API manager are super useful. It's easy to create applications for the agent. Automations and other complex tasks can be hard, but it's mostly straightforward. You can create forms and populate tables."
"You can build your own customized, native, mobile applications in an efficient matter."
"We can use a single channel to create an interface for iOS, Android, and other channels."
"You can do rapid development across multiple platforms."
"The best feature is the Kony Studio, which is the product that is used to develop interfaces."
"Comparing other solutions with Temenos Quantum, the later is less mature and presents several issues. Implementing Temenos Quantum has been challenging, resembling a nightmare compared to the smoother experience with the other."
"The initial setup of Temenos Quantum was easy."
"I like the complete, professional social site."
"I have heard from developers that there is documentation missing in the reporting."
"If the price was reduced and the quality of the user interfaces was improved it would be beneficial."
"In an upcoming release, I would like to see custom APIs, better integration with other solutions, and more connectors available."
"In terms of workflow automation, I believe that capabilities for creating the entire business process are required, or, at the very least, the option to model the business process, define complex business events, handle them, and route them to appropriate business stakeholders."
"The pricing structure needs to be improved, the current information is confusing."
"The solution must provide more integration with third-party applications."
"Customer support needs improvement."
"The set up of the solution could be simpler."
"The security and the interface technology could be better in Temenos Quantum. Additionally, a module that can display all the activities that have been done in the system would be helpful."
"They need to improve their tech support's abilities. They do have a good tech support, but it still requires improvement."
"It would be highly beneficial if future iterations of Temenos could incorporate support for QR-based payment methods, as it would enhance the platform's capabilities and align it more closely with modern payment trends"
"We would like to have widgets for graphs and analytics, as well as the integration of machine learning."
"The UI lacks flexibility, especially regarding customizations. There are numerous issues at the fabric end, and working with the visualizer is extremely challenging. Basic development tasks require a high-end machine, and even clicking on an icon initiates a thirty-second processing time. The challenges mainly revolve around fabric and content."
"Using the API manager can be complicated when you're dealing with multiple teams, projects, and APIs. Quantum doesn't have user-based access, so I can't restrict parts of the project to specific users."
"There is definitely room for improvement, especially in the areas of AI, AR, and DR for mobile and web applications"
"Temenos Quantum is not quite stable yet."
Microsoft Power Apps is ranked 1st in Rapid Application Development Software with 78 reviews while Temenos Quantum is ranked 18th in Rapid Application Development Software with 15 reviews. Microsoft Power Apps is rated 7.8, while Temenos Quantum is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of Microsoft Power Apps writes "Low-code, low learning curve, and reduces manpower". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Temenos Quantum writes "Though a secure tool for building applications, there is a need to improve its stability". Microsoft Power Apps is most compared with Oracle Application Express (APEX), Mendix, ServiceNow, Appian and Microsoft Azure App Service, whereas Temenos Quantum is most compared with OutSystems, Microsoft Azure App Service and ServiceNow. See our Microsoft Power Apps vs. Temenos Quantum report.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.