We performed a comparison between Oracle GlassFish and Oracle WebLogic Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, Apache, Red Hat and others in Application Server."The products offers EE support."
"It has helped us to have different clusters within different servers, which allows us to identify hacker attacks."
"The technical support is responsive. They are always ready to help by various communication channels, such as Zoom calls. However, sometimes it will take a while because when we are dealing with a problem, they need to look at the logs and configuration. A lot of the issues are related to the configuration that they need to look at thoroughly before they can give us a solution and it can take a few days depending on the type of problem."
"One of the good features of Oracle WebLogic Server was the ability to add some custom parameters to its deployment and performance."
"It's a very stable solution."
"Oracle WebLogic Server has a bunch of ready features that are easy to use and understand."
"Oracle WebLogic Server is secure."
"The only difference is that Weblogic is lighter and consumes less memory."
"It's a scalable product."
"I would like to see integration with MQ systems."
"The pricing is a little bit higher compared to other products."
"Its pricing should be better. We are analyzing other options, such as JBoss, because of the cost of WebLogic."
"If you want to use Oracle products to the fullest with enhanced customizations, you need to get trained. There is enough documentation and the flexibility to configure the application to your needs but you will need to spend more time gathering the knowledge."
"Oracle WebLogic Server's configuration could be improved because we need to do multiple configurations when setting up anything."
"The cost could always be lower."
"There are always ways to improve. But it's getting better every time, with every new release, and every new patch, it's getting better."
"Having clearer mechanisms to directly map a database-level connection problem to the corresponding WebLogic thread would greatly enhance the administrator's convenience."
"The administration is hard, and it is more complex to use than others."
Earn 20 points
Oracle GlassFish is ranked 9th in Application Server while Oracle WebLogic Server is ranked 1st in Application Server with 33 reviews. Oracle GlassFish is rated 6.0, while Oracle WebLogic Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Oracle GlassFish writes "Offers EE Support. I would like to see integration with MQ systems". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle WebLogic Server writes "Offers efficient load distribution with a scope of high scalability ". Oracle GlassFish is most compared with JBoss, Tomcat, IBM WebSphere Application Server and IIS, whereas Oracle WebLogic Server is most compared with Tomcat, JBoss, Oracle Application Server, Oracle Fusion Middleware and TmaxSoft JEUS.
See our list of best Application Server vendors.
We monitor all Application Server reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
