We performed a comparison between QPR ProcessAnalyzer and UiPath Process Mining based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Process Mining solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Discovery and root cause analysis"
"I have found the most valuable features of QPR ProcessAnalyzer to be Process Discovery, KPIs, definition, and dashboarding. These are the main features we are working on."
"UiPath's communication interface looks good."
"UiPath Process Mining has a good roadmap ahead for the future."
"It empowers employee decision-making. It helps them locate bottlenecks and remediate items."
"UiPath Process Mining is really compact, like desktops and desktop automation. It is easy to make and easy to use."
"The most valuable feature is that it improves our processes and it deploys automation at a cheaper price, higher efficiency, and accuracy."
"The automation has proven to be immensely valuable as we now have a running bot handling everything."
"When it comes to valuable features, I think the first one will be the way we can visualize the whole process."
"We find the solution is scalable."
"The user interface of QPR ProcessAnalyzer could improve, it is not very intuitive."
"Communication with clients could be improved."
"While it is fairly stable, this is something that could be improved."
"Improvements could be made in educating a new support team for enhanced efficiency and effectiveness."
"It would be helpful if licensing costs were reduced."
"The remote desktop we utilize suffers from inconsistent performance, sometimes functioning well and other times not."
"If UiPath can identify where it has gone wrong and try to identify the bottleneck value, which are more machine learning in AI, it would be great."
"The interface could be more user-friendly so that it is easier for business people to use."
"We faced issues with the data sharding process. UiPath has its own limitations in terms of the number of rules of data it can actually handle at a given point of time."
"There are a few complexities involved in setting up the solution."
Earn 20 points
QPR ProcessAnalyzer is ranked 15th in Process Mining while UiPath Process Mining is ranked 2nd in Process Mining with 74 reviews. QPR ProcessAnalyzer is rated 8.6, while UiPath Process Mining is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of QPR ProcessAnalyzer writes "Useful dashboards, plenty of features, and initial setup simple". On the other hand, the top reviewer of UiPath Process Mining writes "A stable solution with a comparison feature that helps people to understand and visualize the impact of a particular task". QPR ProcessAnalyzer is most compared with Celonis and SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, whereas UiPath Process Mining is most compared with Celonis, SAP Signavio Process Manager, FortressIQ, ABBYY Timeline and SAP Signavio Process Intelligence. See our QPR ProcessAnalyzer vs. UiPath Process Mining report.
See our list of best Process Mining vendors.
We monitor all Process Mining reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.