We performed a comparison between SAP SuccessFactors and SAP SuccessFactors Learning based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Workday, Oracle and others in Cloud HCM."The self-service part is most valuable. Employees and managers can do a lot of things on their own, and they are not dependent on the HR organization."
"I love SAP, and I like SuccessFactors...I think most users prefer SuccessFactors as they become more comfortable with it."
"The performance of the solution is very good."
"The solution is very intuitive. Many of the things we need to do are easily accessible."
"The initial setup was pretty simple."
"The solution is stable."
"Currently, we are using the performance and goals management functionality the most. It is connected with the enterprise solution, and it is seamless. It can be easily accessed because it is available via the net. It is readily available, provided you have an internet connection. Their technical support is also very good."
"Provides an open architecture and an open platform so it can coexist with other systems."
"SAP SuccessFactors Learning is very user-friendly."
"The analytics and reporting features are very helpful."
"The solution is a user-friendly application for learning, designing, and setting up courses."
"The learning features are great."
"Cloud Solution enables accessing the system from the internet, with no need to be within the company network."
"SAP SuccessFactors Learning is highly scalable."
"Safety is the most robust aspect of this platform."
"The best feature of SAP SuccessFactors Learning for me is the assignment profile. It's a rather specific feature, but this is what comes to mind."
"I don't think SuccessFactors is quite fit for use as an employee database."
"User experience for this solution needs to be improved."
"The complete integration process between SuccessFactors modules is not at the level that all customers expect when it comes to complete HR user experience from all angles."
"The solution is quite expensive."
"They should work on a faster way of locating a proper documentation."
"The Onboarding module must be improved."
"SuccessFactors should consider building their best practices around critical industries to help companies become more differentiated in the markets they operate in."
"The Reporting/Analytics and User Interface need improvement."
"The product needs to improve its escalation system."
"The flexibility and user-friendliness of the user's front end can be improved."
"One area I would like to improve in SAP SuccessFactors Learning is the overall user experience and product feedback loop."
"Licensing is a major challenge in the solution."
"SAP SuccessFactors Learning's e-learning portal has a very poor interface when compared to Cornerstone or PeopleFluent. It's a very basic interface, but I know that it has a very good foundation."
"SAP SuccessFactors Learning doesn't have a punch-in and punch-out facility."
"The product's configuration process needs improvement."
"This solution does not support right to left for the Arabic Language, and the Arabic text support is very bad."
SAP SuccessFactors is ranked 1st in Cloud HCM with 90 reviews while SAP SuccessFactors Learning is ranked 4th in Learning Management Systems (LMS) with 24 reviews. SAP SuccessFactors is rated 7.8, while SAP SuccessFactors Learning is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of SAP SuccessFactors writes "Offers many useful modules and integrations, and helps companies adhere to best practices". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP SuccessFactors Learning writes "An easy-to-deploy and stable solution helpful for multiple HR-related activities". SAP SuccessFactors is most compared with SAP HCM, Workday, Oracle HCM Cloud, PeopleSoft and UKG, whereas SAP SuccessFactors Learning is most compared with Moodle, Workday, Litmos, Cornerstone Learning and INX +LMS.
We monitor all Cloud HCM reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.