We performed a comparison between Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring and Zabbix based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature in this solution is the log searching."
"The feature I find most valuable, is the data integration."
"We haven't really experienced any glitches or bugs."
"It's a very easy-to-use solution."
"The Add data feature lets you gather any type of log and easily analyze it."
"The data collection from our VMs, containers, databases, and backend components is valuable."
"The vibrant dashboards are valuable."
"I find the monitoring console very helpful. With one click, I can see how we are performing, and at the same time, I can see what data is flowing."
"It has good graphs of what is going on within the operating system."
"It meets my organizational needs. It's pretty easy to use."
"I really enjoy network traffic triggers that allow us to check traffic threshold from ISP."
"The integration with third-party tools and the alerts are most valuable."
"We value the auto-host discovery, template import, bulk import/export features. Newer versions also add nice features, such as multi-IP per host."
"It not only provides the preconfigured item monitoring feature, but it is also easy to configure custom items."
"The solution allows for good integration with other products."
"The basic setup is very easy."
"The deployment can be quite complex."
"The solution's stability is an area that has room for improvement. It needs to provide constant stability to its users."
"It's a bit difficult to use. It takes some time to get into it and to get it to do what you would like it to do. It is not straightforward to use it."
"The end-to-end visibility is lacking because Splunk cannot directly monitor network devices."
"I would like to see an improvement and some innovation in the customer interface."
"They need more EDR functionalities."
"Splunk would be better if some tools were integrated to be able to take action on security or network concerns."
"It does not have a user-friendly interface and it is difficult to use."
"The server monitoring could be better."
"I would like to see a more flexible mobile client, and better HA out of the box."
"Zabbix isn't a great tool for cloud-specific monitoring - its connection to public clouds needs to be improved. Other areas for improvement would be the lack of dashboards and integrations."
"The reporting features need improvement, especially detailed inventory reporting. Since it's freeware, reporting may not be a major focus."
"I would like to better be able to monitor Oracle processes."
"Zabbix can use better documentation and support for troubleshooting."
"I had problems using Zabbix when working with SUSE Enterprise; many companies use SUSE."
"Even though it’s such a powerful monitoring system, it would be more helpful if it had a flexible UI."
More Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Pricing and Cost Advice →
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring is ranked 15th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 24 reviews while Zabbix is ranked 1st in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 101 reviews. Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring is rated 8.2, while Zabbix is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring writes "Helps to ingest a massive amount of raw data and use it effectively". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zabbix writes "Allows any number of customizations but lacks functionality for finding root causes". Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring is most compared with ServiceNow IT Operations Management, Nagios XI, Amazon CloudWatch, Cisco Intersight and ITRS Geneos, whereas Zabbix is most compared with Centreon, Checkmk, Nagios Core, Amazon CloudWatch and SolarWinds NPM. See our Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring vs. Zabbix report.
See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors and best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
