We performed a comparison between Trellix Endpoint Security and Trend Micro Deep Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, SentinelOne, CrowdStrike and others in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)."Ability to get forensics details and also memory exfiltration."
"Fortinet FortiEDR's firewalling, rule creation, monitoring, and inspection profiles are great."
"The stability is very good."
"Fortinet FortiEDR's scalability is quite good, and you can add licenses to the solution."
"I get alerts when scripts are detected in the environment."
"It is a scalable solution...The initial setup of Fortinet FortiEDR was straightforward."
"It is stable and scalable."
"Impressive detection capabilities"
"What I like best is the integrated end-to-end security that works with the security information and events manager."
"Would benefit with the addition of DLP features."
"The most valuable feature is ease of use."
"We really like the dashboard from Trellix and we've found that it's pretty informative."
"The central management console is powerful. You can manage endpoints, DLP, encryption, and all the other features from a single console."
"Threat prevention is valuable because most clients use other solutions like antivirus as part of web protection. I don't find that kind of solution useful."
"The most valuable features of the solution include DLP (data loss prevention), CASB (cloud access security broker) functionality, endpoint encryption, and cloud workload security."
"The primary reason the solution is good is because of its ease-of-use."
"The integration and configuration of this product in our AWS environment was good. We haven't had any problems at all."
"One of the most valuable features is that it's a firewall-based solution. We just open the required reports to the server—to server communication—and that's how we use Deep Security."
"We've found stability to be great so far."
"Support and threat prevention are the most valuable features of this solution."
"The most valuable feature of the product is vulnerability detection."
"Deep Security's most valuable features are antivirus and host intrusion detection."
"It is connected into an intelligence database and is quick to pick up new threats. It also reduces my workload with its speed and the protection that it provides."
"The vulnerability scanning reduces false positives by quite a bit."
"There's room for improvement in the quick response time and technical support for integration issues, especially when dealing with multiple vendors."
"It takes about two business days for initial support, which is too slow in urgent situations."
"The EDR console should have more extensive reporting. You shouldn't need to purchase FortiAnalyzer. It should be included in the EDR part. The security adviser cloud platform could be improved with more options for exclusive or intensive rules for devices."
"We've had a lot of false positives; things incorrectly flagged that require manual configuration to allow. Even worse, after we allow a legitimate program, it sometimes gets flagged again after an update. This has caused a lot of extra work for my team."
"I think cloud security and SASE are areas of concern in the product where improvements are required. The tool's cloud version has to be improved in terms of the security it offers."
"The solution should address emerging threats like SQL injection."
"We find the solution to be a bit expensive."
"The only minor concern is occasional interference with desired programs."
"Every time we open a ticket with McAfee, their response differs and they are not consistent."
"The platform needs improvement in terms of handling heavy databases."
"We’re facing remote installation issues sometimes:"
"Tech support is not as helpful as they were in the past."
"Signatures to protect against new attacks."
"I would like to have the ability to have more control over the deployment in the next release. If you have this console in the cloud, you cannot make pilot groups for deploying the agents. We only have the current group. So, as soon as you inject the software, it will go directly into production, which doesn't work for us. We need to build up pilot groups slowly. We already requested to have this feature on the cloud, and we are still waiting."
"The price of the solution is high in Asia."
"McAfee GW Security and McAfee Child Safety need some improvement as they are relatively new."
"Enhancements in agent performance are needed, specifically in reducing server utilization during scanning."
"The risk is very complex. We need our tools to be more intelligent, more automated, more detectable."
"It should have XDR and EDR integration. It would be nice if they can tie it up with an XDR or EDR."
"The implementation can be inflexible and not easy, as it requires knowledge of things like virtualization and administration on Windows."
"The support for email protection can be improved."
"It needs better global visibility of the virtual environment."
"They are still working on the company integration from TippingPoint because this was a recent acquisition from a few years ago. So, a Tipping Point integration with Deep Security, having one single pane of glass dashboard, would provide us a simple use case."
"A minor issue in Trend Micro Deep Security is that once the tool is upgraded, it shows some machines as offline or not reported while showing a recent update as outdated. The tool has some server connection issues."
Trellix Endpoint Security is ranked 11th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 96 reviews while Trend Micro Deep Security is ranked 1st in Virtualization Security with 81 reviews. Trellix Endpoint Security is rated 8.0, while Trend Micro Deep Security is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Trellix Endpoint Security writes "Good user behavioral analysis and helpful patching but needs better support services". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Micro Deep Security writes "High availability, effective VPM, and responsive support". Trellix Endpoint Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS), CrowdStrike Falcon, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and SentinelOne Singularity Complete, whereas Trend Micro Deep Security is most compared with Trend Vision One Endpoint Security, CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Symantec Endpoint Security and Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.