Splunk Enterprise Security Reviews

We mostly use the solution for compliance, logging, log storage, and root cause analysis. In 2015, we had AIG as a client, and they only had Splunk. Splunk Enterprise Security is one of the oldest solutions that did the logging and storage.

Splunk has fantastic brand value, which helps us sell it as resellers. The solution's pricing is quite competitive. The solution meets all the requirements. As a compliance person, I know that log storage is very important for data privacy compliance guidelines like ISO or CCPA. Splunk provides all of those compliances and checkmarks.

I like that the tool is light and the agent doesn't slow down the machine. Splunk Enterprise Security is a standard solution providing good customer service and partnership.

The solution should improve regional knowledge of the new regulations coming out of the Middle East. As a consulting firm, we are currently targeting many Middle Eastern markets, including Saudi Arabia and Dubai. They don't have a local server support cloud center there, which is a big issue because they don't want their data to go out of the region. Splunk should have more regional data centers in the Middle East.

I have been using Splunk Enterprise Security for five years.

Splunk Enterprise Security provides good stability.

The solution's scalability is fantastic. Even 10,000 to 50,000 endpoints don't slow anything down. The servers, log storage, and ingestion work smoothly, irrespective of whether there are 5,000 or 50,000 endpoints.

The solution’s technical support is very good.

Our customers using Splunk Enterprise Security don't have any compliance issues, and they don't get fined by the regulators, which saves them money.

Splunk Enterprise Security's pricing is pretty competitive.

I'm a consultant who uses Splunk for other clients. It's important for the clients that it can communicate with all kinds of devices, like firewalls, WAFs, servers, endpoints, switches, and routers. All of that is figured out over time, which is useful.

Splunk Enterprise Security is a good tool for finding security events across multi-cloud, on-premises, or hybrid environments.

Splunk has helped improve our organization's ability to ingest and normalize data. It can also identify and solve P1 or high-critical-priority problems in real-time.

Splunk Enterprise Security has helped us reduce our alert volume by around 50%.

The solution provides us with the relevant context to help guide our investigations, and this context information has impacted our investigation process. Having all the data in a single place does help with post-incident response and forensic root cause analysis.

Splunk Enterprise Security has significantly helped speed up our security investigations. I save 60% to 70% of my time because it's easier to find what I want to find through the tool's user interface.

Splunk Enterprise Security has helped reduce our mean time to resolve by around 50%.

Overall, I rate the solution ten out of ten.

We use Splunk daily to find the root cause of attacks and analyze users attempting to access our system. We create incidents and address 5 to 7 simultaneously. Once we analyze and record the activity, we can delete the incident. Our admin team will verify whether it originated externally or internally. 

We use Splunk to respond to security incidents and for data analytics. We conduct custom correlations for the customer and write reports on any attacks. We set alerts for user behavior to discover threats, like if someone is constantly attempting to access our internal domain. The admin will identify that threat and block it. 

Splunk helps us be more proactive. We can take predictive action to identify and block threats so that nothing harmful gets into the system. With Splunk, we can monitor the entire environment from one place. It's a single point of control for all infrastructure, whether in the cloud or on-premise. Splunk has sped up our security investigations. 

I like Splunk's Notable Events. We have created several dashboards for our customers, where you can see the activity and number of alerts. The database receives data about the mask and domain IPs of any user trying to gain access.  We ingest logs from multiple antivirus products and firewalls and analyze them to prevent attacks and threat activities.

Splunk could have more built-in use case presets that customers can build on and customize. 

I have used Splunk for 9 years. 

Splunk is a stable product.

I rate Splunk technical support 8 out of 10. 

Positive

We previously used Dynatrace but switched to Splunk because it has more features. 

Splunk is easy to deploy if you have some basic knowledge. You need experience. It doesn't require any maintenance after deployment. 

Splunk is a good value for the features it provides. The license is costly, but it's better than the other tools. 

I rate Splunk Enterprise Security 8 out of 10. I would recommend Splunk to others. It's one of the most powerful tools available. It's a valuable tool for monitoring infrastructure. 

We use Splunk Enterprise Security to analyze log data for log monitoring, creating use cases, onboarding, and incident response.

We wanted a single security tool that could immediately identify notable events that could be reported as security breaches, and then enable us to take intelligent action without having to purchase additional security tools.

We have two customers with hybrid cloud solutions. Neither customer is fully cloud-based. Our implementation is based on the customer's requirements, such as compliance, data ownership, and administration. We plan the implementation of Splunk cloud or hybrid models based on these requirements. We discuss the benefits and solutions with the customer to ensure that we are not breaching any compliance policies and that we are selecting the right model for their needs. Because we have multiple customers, we must also consider how to manage this process effectively.

We use multiple cloud environments for our clients, including AWS, Azure, GCP, and private cloud. We can easily integrate Splunk Enterprise Security and segregate the logs based on the type of index we create for each customer. When we create different indexes, we can segregate the types of logs based on the device type. This makes it easy to separate logs from different universal providers, different machines, and specific types of indexes dedicated to particular customers or groups.

We use threat topology and MITRE ATT&CK to create and integrate use cases for network framework detection and visualization in Splunk. Splunk helps us segregate and integrate use cases based on different threat detections and provides a complete dashboard view of how use cases match with detected threats.

When discussing MITRE ATT&CK and topology, we sometimes encounter use cases where we must ensure the logic is properly implemented to detect the threat and trigger the alert. This is because log access may involve specific teams and their associated MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques. We must be very specific about the information we are observing in order to derive the correct information and framework topology.

Splunk is one of the easiest solutions for analyzing malicious activities and detecting breaches. It is flexible enough to work with small teams, and it provides a broad view of the data, allowing us to segregate and fine-tune the analysis based on the customer's requirements.

Splunk Enterprise Security can help us detect threats faster when it is properly configured. We have implemented over 400 use cases for specific types of malware and other threat detection. In over 70 percent of environments, Splunk is able to detect threats faster than other solutions.

It has helped our organization improve by integrating with cloud providers. Splunk enables us to blacklist specific data types and ranges to reduce our losses, based on our requirements.

We have reduced our alert volume by around 50 percent with Splunk. When we first started creating and using Splunk use cases, we received around 700 alerts. Splunk can merge different sources of use cases into one to identify false positives, which has been very helpful for us.

Splunk has helped speed up our security investigations by almost 70 percent. We have a dedicated incident response team. They use the Splunk incident reports to help with their investigations. 

Splunk Enterprise Security comes with 300 pre-deployed use cases that can be easily customized to meet the specific needs of our organization, without the need to purchase additional tools.

We can easily identify the number of security devices and users that are authenticated on the network and present the information to the executive team.

Splunk can improve its third-party device application plugins.

I have been using Splunk Enterprise Security for five years.

Splunk Enterprise Security is stable.

Splunk Enterprise Security is scalable.

The Splunk technical support is good but their call times differ.

Positive

I previously used IBM Security QRadar, Azure Sentinel, and McAfee Network Security Platform. Splunk Enterprise Security is designed for multiple platforms and is easier to implement.

Splunk is much faster when used correctly and has many tools. With the exception of Sentinel, the other solutions do not have many tools. With Sentinel, we have to define the indexes and all those things, such as the aggregation of logs. It is easy to do searches in Splunk, even in a large environment. I find Splunk to be more efficient than the other solutions I have used in the past.

The initial deployment is straightforward. We install the solution and define the roles of each server and the data it will store. The deployment in our test environment took 13 hours.

We have seen a return on our investment in Splunk. The variety of options that Splunk provides is a great selling point for our customers.

While Splunk is more expensive than other solutions, we would still choose it because of its capabilities. Splunk is a leader in the field and provides a wider range of data and security features than other SIEM solutions.

I would recommend Splunk over any of the less expensive SIEM products. I recommend the license-based solution over the user-based solution that Splunk offers. If I had to recommend any other SIEM other than Splunk, it would be Microsoft Sentinel.

I would rate Splunk Enterprise Security seven out of ten.

The threat detection capabilities that we get by default are very basic. However, if we want to implement the most effective threat protection on the internet, we need to purchase a relevant solution for intelligent threat protection. This will provide us with more feeds for enterprise security and help us to integrate data by matching the data to the target and to the security with our Splunk.

We have 60 percent of our customers using Splunk Enterprise Security in their environments.

Splunk maintenance is required for updates. 

Splunk provides a centralized monitoring platform, eliminating the need to switch between different platforms to monitor security. Splunk provides a clear view of different security losses and incidents, and we can onboard any number of devices as needed. We can monitor our entire environment from one place, requiring only one team to monitor it. Splunk adds a lot of value currently.

Being in an air-gapped environment, we pretty much look for insider threats and other notables related to improper configurations and against security best practices.

We are 100% on-prem and in an air-gapped environment, so there is no Internet connection.

There have been some improvements, especially related to centering. We added user behavioral analytics, so it imports everything. Any threat generated inside of that goes into Enterprise Security. I wish anomalies would go in there, but I can understand why they don't, as it generates so many anomalies. However, it would be nice if I could select certain anomalies that would be helpful with notables. This way, I can track down security events before they become threats.

I believe Splunk Enterprise Security has reduced our mean time to resolve, but we do not have any definitive timing metrics.

Splunk has helped improve our organization’s business resilience because it is a central location where correlation searches populate. We can easily track down and figure out where issues lie, which minimizes the time of my SOC team. It probably saves them a couple of hours considering it is colocating everything in one location. It would be nice if there were better ways to search for the data. We can take a look at the raw logs, but we should be able to find the actual event that caused the problem and see all the logs associated with it in a standard log format as opposed to just a text file with all the events added in.

We are a small environment, so we do not get a lot of alerts. We work on the issues as we get them and I am sure it saves a couple of hours.

In terms of its ability to predict, identify, and solve problems in real-time, it works really well when you are connected to the Internet. The predictive analysis is more cloud-based. Trying to find ways to do it on-prem in an air-gapped environment with no Internet connection can be a pain. There are some ways to do risk-based analysis, but we are still hamstrung because we do not have the Internet connection and the larger data sets that they have.

Internal tracking is helpful because we do not like to deal with multiple ticketing systems, and I am not a fan of ServiceNow. We are able to keep everything internal and utilize Enterprise Security. Internal ticketing is helpful because we can bring in all the data and have it all available. That way, we can go back and take a look at it if we find another situation. We do not have to utilize other ticketing systems for cybersecurity.

Its interface and usability can always be improved. We are running on the last version, so I have not checked out how the newest one looks. Currently, we have to track down and remember where things are located. We have new guys on the team, and sometimes they have to click around and figure out where things are.

We have been using Splunk Enterprise Security for about five years.

The solution is not going anywhere. As long as they continue to support and develop it, and not make it a cloud solution, we will continue to purchase it.

We have a total of 500 devices, and we ingest around 150 gigs a day.

The scalability is pretty easy. They recently enabled it to be able to go into a search head cluster. Previously, the only way to install this was on its own dedicated search and it could not be connected to a cluster. Over the last four or five years, they have been pushing harder and harder for clustering everything up for shared resources. Enterprise Security is one of the few apps where you were not allowed to do that. Having scalability with the search head cluster is nice, and it is one thing I am looking at implementing in the future.

Splunk's support is pretty good. I contacted Splunk's support a couple of times. In total, they are helpful, and we are able to get the support where we need it, but unfortunately, it is self-inflicted because we are air-gapped. It takes me anywhere between 45 minutes to an hour and a half to get the logs required. I need to get them sanitized, approved, and transferred over so that I can get them to Splunk. I would rate them a nine out of ten because a couple of times, I found the answer before they did.

They have the best documentation in all of the tech sector, and it is not behind a paywall where you cannot find information. There is certain information in Splunk Knowledge Base under the support page that I believe should be searchable through Google.

Positive

The return on investment is very good because, with ELA, we purchased the products at a reasonable price. We did not have to pay significantly more for licensing than we could possibly use. We were able to combine and get it at a much lower cost point.

In terms of the time to value, it took us a couple of months to get used to the interface and get people trained. Unfortunately, we had some turnover during that time, so we had to constantly retrain or train new people. The newer versions of Enterprise Security that came along made things a little bit easier. Luckily, we had some free training provided to us because we have an enterprise license agreement.

Luckily, we come under a large federal agency, and before the pandemic, they signed a large enterprise license agreement. It worked out great and to our advantage because we are a small organization. We got a 300 gig license, and we just did not have the buying power to be able to get products cheaply. Because we all partnered together under the agency umbrella, we were able to get Splunk Enterprise Security, UBA, and ITSI for cheap. This was good considering the fact that some of these premium apps require a minimum number of users, and we do not have the number of people needed to even justify buying it.

I would rate Splunk Enterprise Security a seven out of ten. There is definitely some room for improvement. I have not installed the newer version. Once I get into it, I will see what new capabilities there are, but there is a decent lift that is needed for the setup. Professional services help with that, but the customer generally does not like paying for that more than once.

Because of the ELA, I am able to come to Splunk conferences for free instead of having to pay my own dime. That helps tremendously, especially considering the fact that education is included. I believe that is because of the enterprise license agreement with the government contract. That helps out a lot. I have been coming to conferences since 2017. There are a lot of good people and a great community. 

We primarily use Splunk Enterprise Security for security incidents and event management. The solution is deployed in one department, but it covers multiple locations worldwide. 

With Splunk, we can monitor and manage enterprise-wide events. It provides a single console for various data sources covering the entire organization, which is critical for compliance purposes.

We can integrate Splunk Enterprise Security with other solutions to automate some security tasks, saving us some time. For example, if you detect potential malware and you want to isolate one system from the organization's network, you don't need to trigger a process. We can fully automate that. Minutes after malware is detected, the machine will be automatically quarantined from the rest of the network. 

You can integrate Splunk with third-party security automation solutions and set rules for automatic response. Splunk can monitor multiple cloud environments, but it's a little tricky if you're working with several vendors. Every cloud environment is slightly different, and some are better integrated.

The visibility into multi-cloud environments is decent. It depends on the number of sources you have, and Splunk is pretty flexible from that perspective. You can add any type of data source. The challenge is the engineering effort some of these data sources require, but others are effortless to manage.

We haven't used the insider threat capabilities yet, but it's an area that we want to explore. We have other tools for this. We use different products for threat intelligence. 

Splunk Enterprise Security could have more pre-built integrations and rules. The detection is fairly accurate, but it depends on the rules you create. Splunk's out-of-the-box configuration isn't that useful. 

If you spend time with your team creating rules specific to your environment, you can get a lot of value from Splunk. At the same time, that requires some additional effort and costs. Splunk has a few built-in integrations that are ready to go. In other cases, we need to build custom solutions, which is more difficult and costly.

I have used Splunk Enterprise Security for about three years. 

It is stable overall. 

Splunk Enterprise Security scales up pretty well. 

I rate Splunk support seven out of 10. There is a little room for improvement. We always start with junior support engineers who lack the experience to deal with complex issues, which are the only problems we ever contact support about. Our staff members can handle most minor issues. 

We typically need to escalate, and we've had an excellent experience with the higher-level engineers. Those qualified engineers are scarce, so I can imagine a situation where two big Splunk customers have significant problems simultaneously, but there aren't enough available technicians. Splunk has the right people but maybe not enough of them. The process could also be improved. 

Neutral

Deploying Splunk was relatively complex. After deployment, it requires some maintenance and management. A team of about 10-15 people is responsible for the solution. 

We deployed Splunk with an in-house team of five to 10 people and some professional support from the vendor. 

We've seen an ROI by automating Splunk Enterprise Security, but automation requires another product and license. 

Splunk Enterprise Security is quite expensive compared to some products on the market. 

The company evaluated a few tools before deciding on Splunk. I used ArcSight at a previous job. Splunk is more flexible than ArcSight, and it has various modules you can purchase to expand the functionality. You don't need to invest in a different solution because you can purchase add-ons for your existing infrastructure. 

It's modular, so you can tailor Splunk to your organization's size, structure, and specific needs. The customer can do it. You don't need to request it from a service provider. 

I rate Splunk Enterprise Security eight out of 10. My advice would be that before deploying Splunk, research some of the company's materials and make sure it meets your cybersecurity requirements. 

You may need to purchase other tools, and the solution might not do everything you want it to do out-of-the-box. Depending on your environment, you'll probably need to invest some time and money into the solution to get the results you want. 

We use Splunk for monitoring and investigation and recently integrated it with ServiceNow. It's a SOC tool, and any malicious activities on the client's side trigger an alert here. 

Splunk has improved our operations by giving us access to more information and allowing us to deploy more use cases. We have integrated Splunk with ServiceNow, so the information from the queries running on the back end is now directly forwarded to the analysts, reducing the manual work. We are pulling data from Splunk into ServiceNow, so the security analysts have all the user details to conduct their investigations. 

It's easy to monitor multiple environments with Splunk. The cloud model is better than the previous on-premises version. The custom dashboards are helpful. We have created multiple dashboards for user activity, logins, phishing, etc. If you miss an alert, you can check the dashboards. For example, if you need to check some user activity, we have a dashboard for Azure Active Directory, and Mimecast is integrated for monitoring email-based attacks like phishing. It throws the information up on the dashboard when we get an alert.

The monitoring aspect of Splunk could be improved. We have to do some queries to get as much information as CrowdStrike or other solutions provide. If you run a big query, you will see a delay. That is the only concern we have because it will take some time if you query large data sets. 

I have used Splunk for more than three years.

I rate Splunk 10 out of 10 for stability. 

Splunk is a highly scalable product. 

I rate Splunk support 10 out of 10.

Positive

Deploying Splunk is somewhat complex, and it requires maintenance afterward. 

Splunk is expensive based on our current requirements, but it's obviously worth what we pay. 

I rate Splunk Enterprise Security nine out of 10. I see Splunk as a monitoring tool, not as a security tool. It provides alerts, and we conduct an analysis and investigation based on the information we receive. I believe having another sandbox integrated with Splunk will be helpful for the investigator.

We are using Splunk in the standard information security use case. We're also using it for various application use cases around identity management, windows active directory, and those types of use cases.

Splunk has provided a venue for us to determine student engagement during COVID, for which we didn't really have any other way except by looking at data that we captured off of our student systems and our authentication servers to see who's logging in, and who's logging out, and for how long they've been logged in.

The feature that I have found most valuable with Splunk is the ability to sift through a bunch of data very quickly.

We have about a 500 gig license with Splunk, so it's not like petabytes of data, but even 500 gigs is kind of hard to sift through sometimes.

Splunk has been improving consistently over the last couple of revs. I still think there are some administrative features that they could improve on and make them less kludgy, but from a user perspective, it has gotten very clean and very sexy looking over the last few builds. So the users seem to like it.

By less kludgy, I mean that in the version I'm running, I still have to go into the command line and modify files and then go into the GUI and validate that they got modified. So it's not all in the GUI, but it has been moving slowly to the GUI over the last several versions. It would be nice if they could move all of the administrative features into a GUI platform so that when you're in the Splunk distributed environment management platform, you then don't have to go into the command line to add new applications or new packages that you then want to be able to push out to your forwarders. Their forwarder management is still kind of split that way.

I don't really have any feature requests in Splunk's space. They seem to be doing a good job of keeping it contemporary from that perspective. 

Splunk's mission is to move everyone to the cloud and charge us a bunch more money. Their goal is to cloud source everything, and quite honestly, the price of cloud sourcing the product, even at smaller 500 gigs a day (which isn't a lot of data by Splunk standards) in the cloud for that is ludicrous. The cost for me to buy equipment every three years and own licensing and run it local to my prem, is significantly less from a three or five year license. I'm going to spend X amount of money on hardware every X years, and I'm going to have to pay licensing costs on software of X over that same period versus that amount that I'd amortize over five years is what I would be paying every year in the cloud.

That is the point with the product. It seems like they are so focused on forcing everyone into the cloud that they seem to be not understanding that there are people that don't have those really deep pockets. It's one thing for a Fortune 50 company to spend a million dollars a year in the cloud. It's another thing when you're a nonprofit educational institute to spend that kind of money in the cloud. Even though we do get some discounts in most of the cloud space providers, it is still not on par with the big public businesses.

I have been using Splunk for probably 10 years.

At least in our environment, it is super stable. When you think about how much time you spend working with other applications, just Windows Server requires more feeding than Splunk does, you see that Splunk is a very low maintenance care and feeding product.

We have probably 150 users in the environment and their roles vary from being application management folks to application engineering folks to the executive suite, so lots of different use cases. The executive suite tend to prefer more curated content and the application owners have a mix of curated content and dynamic search functions they can perform. Then the engineering tier basically gets some curated content and some free reign to do whatever they want for the most part. I'm the guy that supports this instance. So there's one person.

I support not only Splunk, but I am also the campus security engineer and I'm also the dude that runs or is responsible for all of our campus monitoring infrastructure. So that tells you how little maintenance is required.

We are adding new use cases on a fairly regular basis and we are adding more licensing to our indexing license. I don't see Splunk going away. There's nothing else that I think provides the ability to do this much data analytics from just the numbers of equipment that you need to run it. Also, the number of people that you need to actually make sure that it's functioning well. In higher ed., everybody always says we should do open source. And I respond that what I do in Splunk with 20 systems, I would need three racks of equipment to do on an open source platform. I have basically 70 - 75% of the racks now and I'd need three times that or more to run this as an open source product. And it wouldn't be as cute and it wouldn't be as beautiful or as flexible.

I know other folks in the higher ed. space that are running petabyte size instances with Splunk. So I would have to say it scales very well just from talking to the folks in my market silo.

Their technical support sucks.

My engagement with their technical support was for a product which they basically took over from an open source product and they just seemed to not be able to figure out why it's not doing what it's supposed to do. The number of times I've had to engage with Splunk for solutions has been for a couple of use cases. And in every one of those use cases, support was very painful. It took a very long time and it seemed like they were more interested in burning their queue volume than actually satisfying me as a customer.

I work in higher ed. Here in higher ed., it costs us a lot of money to run it. The support from the company that you spend a lot of money with is pretty poor. I get most of my support through the Splunk sales folks because they seem to know more and they're more incentivized to keep me as a customer. When I call in to open a ticket with Splunk support, they really don't know, and this is going to sound terrible, they don't really care whether I have a 50 Meg license or a 50 petabyte license. If it's not on their workflow, their pre-programmed triage, they can't do it.

Splunk came into being at Case Western when we were looking for a better log product than Check Point was providing at that point in time. My entire investment in Splunk, in hardware and software and integration cost, was cheaper than what Check Point was going to provide, or what the Check Point solution path was for just looking at firewall data. We knew we needed to be able to do more analytics than what we were currently getting out of our firewall products and Splunk was brought in to do that. It can do this and a whole lot more.

Splunk is a complex critter to put in and it's a more complex critter to keep running. We have 10 search heads and four indexers and universal and a heavy forwarding cluster. We have clustered indexers and clustered search heads. This is definitely not a drag and drop product.

We engaged a third party Splunk integrator to help us do our Splunk deployment and they did our initial deployment. We used a different integrator to do some of our upgrades, which we probably won't use again. Our implementation strategy was we really just wanted to look at the classic security use case when we put this in 10 years ago. Then after that came in, and everybody was happy with what it was doing, we added some other use cases and universal forwarding and so on and so forth.

We used an integrator.

The integrator we used to do our initial deployment was excellent. The integrator we used to do our last round of upgrades was less than excellent.

When I hire an integrator to do an upgrade in an environment, I expect them to come back and say "all of your application layer apps are upgradeable, but your OS's need to be upgraded. Do you want me to do that? Or should you do that?" I now have different versions of OS's under Splunk running in my Linux world and it would've been nice to upgrade the system OS and then upgrade Splunk, even if it was more disruptive. I guess I have to read the statement of work more closely in the future.

The TCO and ROI are really great if you're in the private, non-public sector and you're in a more standard business sector. The return on investment in total cost of ownership on Splunk is from somebody who doesn't fit into that neat silo. Do we calculate that stuff? So our return on investment is by being able to solve problems that we never knew we could solve. My answer to it is the flexibility to be able to figure out student engagement when COVID hit. This was the only platform we could do it on.

I can comment on price in this way - in education in Ohio, we're part of the Ohio supercomputer consortium, and they act as a collective bargaining agent. So we get our licensing as a piece of the State of Ohio's Splunk license. So my pricing is very much not list or even reduced list because of the volume that the state buys.

We generally spend about $20,000 a year in third party integrator costs to get us past some of the rough edges that we get with Splunk support.

We briefly looked at the open source product and we obviously looked at a Check Point product. When we looked at Splunk it seemed like they had a smaller cost to procure it, and a much smaller cost to maintain it than all of those other solutions. So it was kind of why we went with Splunk. This is very non-intuitive since everybody says they love Splunk but it costs too much.

My advice to anyone considering Splunk is to understand exactly how much data you want to look at and you want to bring in on a daily basis. Then create a rational strategy to bring the data in, in reasonably sized chunks, that fulfill a use case at a time.

On a scale of one to ten, I would rate Splunk a really good nine.

I'd rate it a really good nine because it's really versatile. You can do a lot of things with it. It allows you to do a lot of analytics in the platform without needing a bunch of other third partyware to help you figure it out.

Since we have an IT services company, we have been using Splunk for the deployment to the customer locations as well. Sometimes the customer will come back to us and say that we need to have a SIEM tool, and when we do the benchmarking, we'll do a couple of deployments on the Splunk side and at the customer's locations as well.

As an example use case, we deployed Splunk to a banking institution a few years ago. There the use case was basically this: the customer wanted to set up a security operation center, and they wanted to have a pretty large deployment in terms of the number of endpoints and number of switches and routers. There were many regional branch offices and they have data centers and therefore, many assets in terms of endpoints. They had 30% of their assets are running on the cloud and they needed a complete solution from an incident monitoring and management perspective. That's why we deployed Splunk. 

They wanted to reduce the MTTR, and meantime resolution, and maintain detection. They didn't want to add more SOC analysts into their SOC as the organization scaled up. They have a plan to scale from 5,000 endpoints into 15-20,000 endpoints. They're very particular about deploying the SOC operation center.

Splunk has since acquired Phantom as a SOAR platform. Therefore, we have tried to manage the security automation using Phantom with the help of Splunk deployments. It helps us meet the customer's requirements.

In terms of support, we're able to get the right support at the right time. If there's a break or an appliance issue, they're are on top of it.

This is very important during large-scale deployments. It's not easy to address product-related issues or appliance-related issues, and the number of collectors or number of logs that come into the collector, and managing the collectors across the branch offices, across the corporate offices, etc. It is a cumbersome process for us. That's why it's integral that we get the right support at the right time - and they make this happen.

The most valuable aspect of the solution is the dashboard. It's very intuitive. 

The reporting is excellent. The team and the SOC analyst are able to easily track the alerts and the correlation is very good compared to other SIEM tools. 

There are a lot of competitive products that are doing better than what Splunk is doing on the analytics side.

The automation could be better. Typically, the issue that we face is that it has to go to the analytics engine, then goes to the automation engine, basically. Therefore, if there are no proper analytics, the SOAR module is going to be overloaded, and we are not able to get the expected result out from the SOAR module. If they improve the analytics, I think they'll be able to solve these issues very quickly.

The playbooks which they create and provide to premium users can improve a lot. They have to create a common platform wherein the end-customers like us can choose the playbooks, and automation playbooks readily available.

In terms of integration with the third-party tools, what we are seeing is that it's very limited compared to the competitive products. Competitive products have a lot of connectors and APIs that they have developed, and that's where the cloud integration, whether it is a public cloud or a private cloud integration comes in. There are a lot of limitations to this product compared to other products.

In terms of Splunk, I've been working on it for more than three years in the current company. Prior to that, I worked with it at another company as well. In total, I have been using Splunk for close to six or seven years.

The solution is stable, however, sometimes in some of the collectors, we are facing a lot of issues. That said, overall, if you rate it from one to five, I would say in terms of stability, it will stand at a three. 

The scalability is perfectly fine. It's very awesome compared to all the other tools, as easily we can integrate with the log forwarding modules and the collector management appliances or modules. That aspect won't be a problem. 

If you look at the SIEM as a market today, Splunk is expensive compared to other competitive products. I'm also into the SIEM evaluation in my current role. I've seen that there are many tools are coming up in the last one and half years. I have also seen many other mature tools that are available now. If you compare next-gen SIEM tools compared to the Splunk, it's expensive. Therefore, it's possible we may not use this in the future or expand on current usage.

In terms of technical support, we don't have any issues, as the professional services which they have extended to us are very, very good. We're able to manage many of the critical issues with their support. I'd say we are definitely satisfied with the level of service provided.

In terms of deployment, it's not so complex compared to the competitive products, however, we will be able to manage that deployment. We don't feel there's any problem on the deployment side. In that sense, I don't think deployment is a complex one when somebody going for Splunk as a tool.

How long it takes to deploy the solution depends on the size of the deployment, basically. Even a large deployment won't take more than a week. When I say deployment, I'm considering all the log collection, log management, and the curation of the incidents, and how incidents are created and routed properly according to prioritization. 

In terms of ROI, for example, if you look at one of our customers today, they are managing close to 100 million events per day. If you look at a traditional SIEM with 100 million events, they need to manage this environment with at least 25 to 30 people. That's 30 security analysts that have to be there. However, when Splunk was deployed, a lot of automation was added on top of it, and today we are managing the same environment with Splunk with close to 15 people. In that sense, if you look at it that way, the ROI is between 30-40%.

In terms of a comparison with the rest of the competition, the licensing cost would be, I would say, 30% higher than most.

Before choosing Splunk, we have evaluated QRadar and LogRhythm. QRadar is much more expensive. LogRhythm lacked reporting.

We ended up choosing Splunk due to the pricing and the reporting features. It also had the kind of scalability that was required. We felt it would help us in terms of positioning from both a cost perspective and an incident alert perspective.

We're partners. We have a business relationship with Splunk.

We're using the latest version of the solution.

Overall, I would rate the solution at a seven out of ten.

I'd advise potential new users to ensure they do proper sizing before deploying the product. If it's a very large deployment, the number of endpoints will be quite sizeable. You need to figure out the correct number of endpoints as well as endpoint devices, switches, routers, etc.

It's also a good idea to look at use cases. Splunk is very strong in some use cases. It's important to look into deployment scenarios and check out the use cases before deploying anything.

My biggest takeaway after working with the solution is that the environment is very important. You need to be clear about the problem you are addressing and it takes a lot of planning at the outset.