We performed a comparison between AppDynamics and Coralogix based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The flow map is very valuable to us. Before we installed APM, we had no idea how our application looked."
"Error analysis in the troubleshooting sections go straight to the point."
"In AppDynamics, everywhere I go, there's some sort of grouping and aggregation function, or there's some sort of timeline that lets me zero in more quickly on the traces that I need. They go to more pains to aggregate and bubble the important ones to the top. That removes a lot of manual work."
"We can make custom alerts in our system for specific issues like high CPU utilization or application downtime."
"It reduces the time to resolve issues and requires less manpower."
"AppDynamics has been stable."
"I think the performance and interface are the most important features."
"Capacity planning is, in my opinion, the most useful."
"The solution offers very good convenience filtering."
"The solution is easy to use and to start with."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"A non-tech person can easily get used to it."
"The best feature of this solution allows us to correlate logs, metrics and traces."
"Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams."
"The overall performance of this solution could be improved. The hot-hot infrastructure features could also be improved."
"I think I would like to see a better way to deploy and upgrade the machine agents that we use. Currently, we have to use SCCM, and that might just be our environment with the customer."
"It could do with more than one data centre/multiple AWS accounts in a pane of glass. Also, improved scalability to large environments would be helpful."
"There are too many installers available for this solution."
"While it is scalable, it could be better."
"There could log management features included in the product."
"Sometimes, it is hard to navigate through and find if something is wrong or figure out where an error stemmed from."
"I’d like to see better out-of-the-box visual reporting so that we can roll this up to management."
"We want it to work at what it is expected to work at and not really based on the updated configuration which one developer has decided to change."
"Maybe they could make it more user-friendly."
"The documentation of the tool could be improved"
"It would be helpful if Coralogix could integrate the main modules that any organization requires into a single subscription."
"The user interface could be more intuitive and explanatory."
"From my experience, Coralogix has horrible Terraform providers."
AppDynamics is ranked 5th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 155 reviews while Coralogix is ranked 26th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 7 reviews. AppDynamics is rated 8.2, while Coralogix is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of AppDynamics writes "Very good real-time monitoring capabilities, deep problem diagnosis, and transaction mapping". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Coralogix writes "Good capabilities, has a helpful interface and is straightforward to set up". AppDynamics is most compared with Dynatrace, Elastic Observability, Datadog, Splunk Enterprise Security and New Relic, whereas Coralogix is most compared with Datadog, Grafana, Sentry, New Relic and MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager. See our AppDynamics vs. Coralogix report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.