We performed a comparison between Coralogix and Datadog based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution offers very good convenience filtering."
"Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams."
"The solution is easy to use and to start with."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The best feature of this solution allows us to correlate logs, metrics and traces."
"A non-tech person can easily get used to it."
"The initial setup is very straightforward."
"Datadog helps us detect issues early on and helps in troubleshooting."
"The ability to send notifications based on metadata from the monitor is helpful."
"The most valuable feature I have found is the elastic container service."
"The most valuable feature of Datadog is its logs."
"Sometimes it's more user friendly for development teams. There are some parts of Datadog that are more understandable for development teams. For example, the APM in Datadog works more manually and works like the tools in New Relic or Grafana, or Elastic. It is easier to understand for software development teams."
"I have found some of the most valuable features to be the way things all come together that gives us a point of view that is useful. The panel is very beautiful and customizable."
"Most of the features in the way Datadog does monitoring are commendable and that is the reason we choose it. We did some comparisons before picking Datadog. Datadog was recommended based on the features provided."
"The documentation of the tool could be improved"
"Maybe they could make it more user-friendly."
"We want it to work at what it is expected to work at and not really based on the updated configuration which one developer has decided to change."
"The user interface could be more intuitive and explanatory."
"It would be helpful if Coralogix could integrate the main modules that any organization requires into a single subscription."
"From my experience, Coralogix has horrible Terraform providers."
"When the logs are too big, and Datadog splits them, the JSON format breaks and it is not so useful for us."
"Lacks some flexibility in the customization."
"Federated views for Datadog dashboards are critical as large companies utilize multiple instances of the product and cannot link the metrics or correlate the metrics together. This stunts the usage of Datadog."
"It could probably be a little bit of a better user experience."
"I'd like to see better pricing and more integration in the next release."
"I'm not sure what kind of features are in the roadmap right now, but I encourage the development of features for defining your organization, and allowing the visibility of what kind of metrics you can get. Those features would be really useful for us."
"Datadog needs more local Asia-Pacific support, and if they don't have a SaaS solution in Asia-Pacific, they should offer an on-prem version. I'm told that's not possible."
"Once agents are connected to the Datadog portal, we should be able to upgrade them quickly."
Coralogix is ranked 26th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 7 reviews while Datadog is ranked 1st in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 137 reviews. Coralogix is rated 8.4, while Datadog is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Coralogix writes "Good capabilities, has a helpful interface and is straightforward to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Datadog writes "Very good RUM, synthetics, and infrastructure host maps". Coralogix is most compared with Grafana, Sentry, New Relic, Elastic Search and Logz.io, whereas Datadog is most compared with Dynatrace, Azure Monitor, New Relic, AWS X-Ray and OpsRamp. See our Coralogix vs. Datadog report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors and best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.