We performed a comparison between Coralogix and Grafana based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The initial setup is straightforward."
"The solution offers very good convenience filtering."
"Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams."
"The solution is easy to use and to start with."
"A non-tech person can easily get used to it."
"The best feature of this solution allows us to correlate logs, metrics and traces."
"It has good stability."
"Grafana is a very scalable product. It's a really good product."
"Kubernetes could help us to better visualize the trend of our data by recording and displaying our history over a chosen duration, such as the last 30 days."
"This solution provides valuable insights into the health of our infrastructure in real time."
"It gives us the visibility we need. I like that when we add deployment markers or release markers, we know exactly when an issue arises. For instance, if there is an increased usage of CPU, we can link it directly to the deployment that might have caused the issue. It increases productivity and observability. We can now easily tell when a certain issue arises. It's way easier to debug because it can point you to certain things based on these markers, and we can debug easier."
"The most important feature of Grafana is its alarm formatting capability."
"It provides a graphical representation and it's clear to see what's happening."
"The installation process is easy. We have deployed it on the cloud. I have around 20 to 30 people using the solution in my company."
"It would be helpful if Coralogix could integrate the main modules that any organization requires into a single subscription."
"Maybe they could make it more user-friendly."
"From my experience, Coralogix has horrible Terraform providers."
"We want it to work at what it is expected to work at and not really based on the updated configuration which one developer has decided to change."
"The user interface could be more intuitive and explanatory."
"The documentation of the tool could be improved"
"Its interface could be more accessible."
"The technical support has room for improvement."
"They should improve the functioning of its editing tool."
"Lacks in-depth graphs and sufficient AI."
"Multiple dashboards combined into one dashboard has slowed things down for us."
"The security needs to be improved, such as the capacity to add permissions on dashboards."
"Setting up alerts via Grafana is a bit complicated, and alerting needs to improve."
"The solution has room for improvement with a better API to help automate the construction of the dashboards easier."
Coralogix is ranked 26th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 7 reviews while Grafana is ranked 6th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 39 reviews. Coralogix is rated 8.4, while Grafana is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Coralogix writes "Good capabilities, has a helpful interface and is straightforward to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Grafana writes "Agent-free with great dashboards and an active community". Coralogix is most compared with Datadog, Sentry, New Relic, Elastic Search and Logz.io, whereas Grafana is most compared with New Relic, Azure Monitor, Sentry, Dynatrace and VMware Aria Operations for Applications. See our Coralogix vs. Grafana report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
