Ardoq vs BiZZdesign HoriZZon comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ardoq Logo
1,180 views|915 comparisons
50% willing to recommend
BiZZdesign Logo
2,530 views|1,158 comparisons
75% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary
Updated on Mar 4, 2024

We compared Ardoq and BiZZdesign HoriZZon based on our user reviews across 4 parameters. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.

Ardoq and BiZZdesign HoriZZon both offer powerful data modeling and visualization tools, with Ardoq focusing on flexibility and collaborative features. BiZZdesign HoriZZon emphasizes an intuitive user interface and comprehensive modeling capabilities. Ardoq users appreciate its integration capabilities and customer support. BiZZdesign HoriZZon users value its customizable dashboards and dynamic reporting tools. Areas for improvement differ slightly, however, both platforms have been praised for their positive return on investment and reliable customer service.

Features: Ardoq stands out for its flexibility in data modeling and collaborative features, with seamless integration capabilities for various third-party tools. BiZZdesign HoriZZon offers customizable dashboards, interactive visualizations, and comprehensive modeling capabilities for effective communication and analysis.

Pricing and ROI: Ardoq users have reported reasonable setup costs and flexible licensing options. BiZZdesign HoriZZon users find the setup cost to be fairly priced and the licensing process straightforward. Both products offer competitive pricing and good value for the features provided. Ardoq users praised its customizable features and intuitive interface for saving time and resources. BiZZdesign HoriZZon users found it cost-effective and efficient for achieving business goals and increasing productivity.

Room for Improvement: Ardoq has room for improvement in better integration, customizable reporting, user training, customer support, system performance, pricing transparency, mobile app functionality, collaboration tools, consulting services, security features, and data protection measures. BiZZdesign HoriZZon could enhance user interface design, user input responsiveness, customization options, speed and performance, intuitive layout, navigation process, response time, platform customization flexibility, and overall user experience.

Deployment and customer support: Ardoq's setup presented difficulties to users particularly for externally hosted applications. BiZZdesign HoriZZon had a relatively easy implementation but faced some feature gaps and obstacles post-setup. Users have commended Ardoq for their supportive and positive customer service, which includes both internal and paid support options. BiZZdesign HoriZZon stands out for its efficient, responsive, and hierarchical escalation support process, leading to high user satisfaction.

The summary above is based on 6 interviews we conducted recently with Ardoq and BiZZdesign HoriZZon users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.

To learn more, read our detailed Ardoq vs. BiZZdesign HoriZZon Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It is a stable solution.""Snapshots are the most valuable feature."

More Ardoq Pros →

"I like the flexibility of the modeling part for standards like ArchiMate and, at the same time, BPMN. It allows us to connect elements from different areas and to have a single repository and a single source of truth. It gives us one place to do analysis throughout the organization.""BiZZdesign HoriZZon is scalable, and I'd give it an eight out of ten for scalability. Our customers are enterprise level companies, but the solution is suitable for small and mid-sized companies as well.""The enterprise studio where the modelling happens is valuable.""The most valuable feature is that it allows you to work with different methods, using the same tool.""This is one of the best tools, especially because of its collaborative nature. Anyone using it can access previous projects and related data. It's definitely a strong collaborative tool.""The powerful editing function in teamwork project-based, common or shared modeling, based on a powerful repository and knowledge sharing in a portal are the most valuable features. These are the most important features for me. I can add the integration of individual modeling notations like Archimate plus BPMN and DMN, and so on. We travel from one location to another and the tool allows us to keep track.""One of the main advantages of this solution is that they have representation in the Open Group Forum, which means that any changes in ArchiMate are immediately implemented in BiZZdesign.""It is very easy to use. I can just click on an application component and find out if we are using this particular component. This provides us flexibility."

More BiZZdesign HoriZZon Pros →

Cons
"Scalability as a standalone system is good, given the information that has been described inside Ardoq. But not the scalability as a third-party system or with integration with other systems. Because in this direction, the scalability is about zero for Ardoq.""The training environment wasn't very intuitive, but maybe with more use, it will get better."

More Ardoq Cons →

"We tested it, and we had support from BiZZdesign, including patches, but it just didn't do what we wanted.""It lacks capabilities with regard to infrastructure modeling.""In HoriZZon, there are different matrices. In some of the cases, there is an option to aggregate them, but in other cases, we have not done this, e.g., to see the proper costs. For example, if I have 10 different matrices, then I need to create an aggregate view out of those 10 matrices somewhere. That is where we have been struggling a bit. We have a counterpart from the HoriZZon product team with whom we have bi-weekly discussions. We have suggested to him that this can be improved.""It should be more open to integrating with other existing tools. Although there has been progress in the past.""The users of BiZZdesign should be able to enter their data or make modeling changes via HoriZZon.""The repository of duplicate objects is bad.""There could be simpler modelling.""There is room for improvement in making it more seamless between the modeling and the analysis pieces. Sometimes you have to do some work in the backend to ensure that the HoriZZon portal really gets all of the information the way you want it. They are working on the seamlessness between what they call Enterprise Studio and HoriZZon."

More BiZZdesign HoriZZon Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We pay for extended support."
  • More Ardoq Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "[The] Orbus... pricing model was based on every single functionality having a price. The pricing was comparable but if we wanted to scale, it would have ended up being a lot more expensive. BiZZdesign gave us one price with all of the functionality, and we could scale as much as we needed."
  • "I haven't found any issues with the scalability and licensing parts that are access-related."
  • "First and foremost within the scope of improvement for the solution would be the cost. It's very costly..."
  • "The pricing model is slightly on the high side and could be more competitive for long-term partnerships."
  • "The price is reasonable."
  • "In terms of this particular product usage, my clients currently only use per-user licenses."
  • More BiZZdesign HoriZZon Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Architecture Management solutions are best for your needs.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Hi @Cheryl Joseph ​Looking at the crossover between Project and Portfolio management with EA, then Planview could be a good choice. If looking at Portfolio Management from an EA perspective then… more »
    Top Answer:Here is a comparison of Ardoq and Sparx Systems, two popular Enterprise Architecture Management (EAM) tools Ardoq Pros: o Ardoq has a user-friendly interface that makes it easy to create and… more »
    Top Answer:This is one of the best tools, especially because of its collaborative nature. Anyone using it can access previous projects and related data. It's definitely a strong collaborative tool.
    Top Answer:Integration definitely needs improvement. There are some restrictions. We've seen that it doesn't integrate with everything we might expect. Out of ten products we want to integrate, maybe five or six… more »
    Top Answer:Our clients deal directly with BiZZdesign. They use it, but what we do is we have some experts who have hands-on experience, and we use that knowledge to implement solutions for them. We don't use any… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    1,180
    Comparisons
    915
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    448
    Rating
    7.5
    Views
    2,530
    Comparisons
    1,158
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    632
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    HoriZZon
    Learn More
    BiZZdesign
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    A Dynamic and Data-Driven Approach to Enterprise Architecture
    Engage and connect stakeholders across the organization with business-friendly visualizations understandable to all.

    Make smarter decisions and optimize outcomes by unifying all your strategy, capabilities, operating models and change portfolios in a single platform.

    With all the data about your business in one place you can see the big picture and make properly informed strategic decisions to drive growth. Bizzdesign Horizzon brings together strategy, IT architecture, operating models, data, capabilities, change portfolios and ideas into a single, intuitive collaborative business design platform. Real-time visibility of key metrics and trends allows you to take action more quickly. Accelerating the speed and accuracy of your operations now – and into the future.

    Core Platform Capabilities:

    • Multi-discipline collaboration
    • Data Integration
    • Advanced analytics
    • Models and Roadmaps
    • Governance & Security
    • Business Insight Graph
    Sample Customers
    Schibsted, Government of Malmo, Torvald
    T-Mobile, Shell, HSBC, Erasmus University, VIVAT Insurance
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Government9%
    Retailer6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization32%
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Computer Software Company7%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise67%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business47%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise47%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business12%
    Midsize Enterprise39%
    Large Enterprise50%
    Buyer's Guide
    Ardoq vs. BiZZdesign HoriZZon
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Ardoq vs. BiZZdesign HoriZZon and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Ardoq is ranked 11th in Enterprise Architecture Management with 2 reviews while BiZZdesign HoriZZon is ranked 7th in Enterprise Architecture Management with 15 reviews. Ardoq is rated 7.6, while BiZZdesign HoriZZon is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Ardoq writes "Provides stable performance and scalability but not intuitive for data modeling". On the other hand, the top reviewer of BiZZdesign HoriZZon writes "Easy to read, use, and get started with". Ardoq is most compared with LeanIX, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, MEGA HOPEX, OrbusInfinity and ADOIT, whereas BiZZdesign HoriZZon is most compared with ARIS BPA, SAP Signavio Process Manager, LeanIX, Visio and erwin Data Modeler by Quest. See our Ardoq vs. BiZZdesign HoriZZon report.

    See our list of best Enterprise Architecture Management vendors.

    We monitor all Enterprise Architecture Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.