We compared Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect and Ardoq based on our user's reviews in 4 parameters. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect is praised for its comprehensive modeling capabilities, a vast library of templates, and competitive pricing. Users have highlighted the need for better UI, documentation, and integration. Users found Ardoq to be flexible in data modeling, collaborative, and easy to use, with some improvements needed in integration, reporting, and customer support responsiveness. Both products offer positive ROI and excellent customer service.
Features: Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect excels in comprehensive modeling and customization options with seamless integration, vast templates. Ardoq stands out for flexibility in data modeling, collaborative platform, integration capabilities, and intuitive user interface.
Pricing and ROI: Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect is noted for its flexibility in licensing options and overall value for the price, although some find the initial setup cost to be high. Users find Ardoq to have reasonable pricing, lower setup costs, and flexible licensing options. Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect is commended for its robust features and cost savings. Ardoq offers customizable features and efficient data visualization, saving time and resources.
Room for Improvement: Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect users suggest improving UI, tutorials, integration, performance, and stability. Ardoq users seek better software integration, reporting, training, support, performance, pricing transparency, mobile app, UI, collaboration, security, and data protection.
Deployment and customer support: Users had mixed experiences with setting up Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, with some finding it simple and others finding it complex. Setting up Ardoq was difficult but doable for most users and took around an hour if done correctly. Ardoq can also be deployed on AWS and Azure for cloud usage. Opinions on Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect's technical support vary, with some customers finding it good while others have not interacted with the team. Ardoq's customer service is regarded as helpful and excellent, especially for paid extended support.
The summary above is based on 11 interviews we conducted recently with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect and Ardoq users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"Sparx has got a range of modeling features, and I am comfortable with all its offering. I've used a lot of tools over the phone. I found EA Spark, probably the most feature rich product all in all compared to other products. The solution is very cost-effective and that is its best feature. It's a very good delivery architecture tool, which also has enterprise architecture capabilities, and it's got full life cycle processes and software development. So for me, it's a pretty comprehensive tool"
"Some of the business processes are very easy to compare when you have the diagrams."
"It is a handy tool for visual modeling that provides opportunities for analysis, design, and support of models using ArchiMate, UML."
"The best thing about the tool is that its database is open."
"Ability to model and create view under same roof."
"The system provides powerful tools for obtaining reports and documentation."
"There are a couple of things. Price is one thing, but we also like the scriptability of it. We got into scripting it and automating tasks with it, and it is super duper easy to do and helpful. The API has improved over the years. We automate everything, and I love the automation aspects of it."
"Sparx technical support is good."
"Scalability as a standalone system is good, given the information that has been described inside Ardoq. But not the scalability as a third-party system or with integration with other systems. Because in this direction, the scalability is about zero for Ardoq."
"The training environment wasn't very intuitive, but maybe with more use, it will get better."
"The integration could be improved."
"When many users are accessing the system at the same time, Sparx slows down. It can't easily support a large team."
"It can be improved in the area of shared documentation. The idea is that the architecture tool can call back to an enterprise asset, pull that information, and link that as a sub-artifact."
"Sparx can be a bit slow. If you are trying to design software architecture, sometimes we run into issues and need to refresh."
"The presentation graphics need to be improved in future builds."
"It took me a while to figure out how to use the report generation features effectively. So, it would be really nice if they had a way to make that a little bit more interactive and a little bit more straightforward."
"The initial setup of the Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect It's very complicated. It's very difficult to start with the right templates because there are many possibilities. The deployment took approximately two days."
"The database management area was not usable."
More Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect Pricing and Cost Advice →
Ardoq is ranked 11th in Enterprise Architecture Management with 2 reviews while Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Architecture Management with 97 reviews. Ardoq is rated 7.6, while Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Ardoq writes "Provides stable performance and scalability but not intuitive for data modeling". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect writes "Easy to set up and had no issues with stability, but it's not a very friendly tool, and its database modeling and entity-relationship modeling functions need improvement". Ardoq is most compared with LeanIX, BiZZdesign HoriZZon, MEGA HOPEX, OrbusInfinity and ADOIT, whereas Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect is most compared with Visual Paradigm, Visio, No Magic MagicDraw, Lucidchart and LeanIX. See our Ardoq vs. Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect report.
See our list of best Enterprise Architecture Management vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Architecture Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
