We performed a comparison between Asana and ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Project Portfolio Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Asana's most valuable aspect is its ability to consolidate all tasks and projects onto a single board, allowing for seamless navigation through timelines from start to finish. Additionally, it enables the inclusion of key stakeholders and provides a private communication channel for discreet discussions. The organizational component of Asana is particularly beneficial, including its coding features."
"My task box displays all of our tasks, organized by day, helping us to focus on what needs to be done each day."
"It's an easy way to communicate."
"Asana has significantly reduced the number of emails we exchange because we can access the project directly. It organizes all the tasks related to each project, assigns them to staff with due dates, and tracks progress."
"Stable Kanban style tool for collaboration and task management. It runs smoothly and has a straightforward setup."
"The tool has a lot of integrations."
"Asana has a wonderful user experience that is very easy to interact with and has tons of integrations with other products and tools."
"This solution is easier and faster to use compared to Jira. It's not very structured and you can add sub-tasks and issues easily."
"The interface is extremely user-friendly."
"ServiceNow brings to the market different layers with different pricing, so you can customize. And all the layers are really enterprise-ready."
"The most valuable feature of ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management is incident management."
"The stability is excellent. ServiceNow is one of the leading platforms when it comes to stability."
"The feature I find the most valuable is the one that lets you see how much time has been used in processing a ticket. This allows us to better monitor performance."
"The product is quite convenient and user-friendly."
"The performance is good."
"The program is stable."
"It's hard to integrate Asana into other parts of the company workflow, so integration is an area for improvement."
"Some customizations and functions are still not available, however, so far, they haven't been a deal killer."
"We'd like the capability to be able to set up weekly reminders."
"The calendar view in Asana has shortcomings and can be improved."
"If you have been using a tool like Jira for many years, it make time some time to get used to the minimalist layout in Asana."
"On the development side for technical project management, Asana is missing features. We only use it for discussing tasks and strategies, and we use it for customer to-do lists. It doesn't have the source code integration that Jira and Jira Service Desk both have."
"For large teams, scalability should be improved."
"There just needs to be a bit more direction on how to use it at the outset."
"The timing reporting module, and how it's used is a bit difficult to understand. Everything related to project management is quite extensive. It needs to be simplified. At first, our users didn't want to use it, because it seems a bit complex."
"When we originally set it up, we had some kind of success manager free of charge, and now it's an additional charge over and above what we're paying."
"ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management could improve by having more Agile features. Other solutions, such as Rally have more."
"ServiceNow IT Business Management could improve by adding better artificial intelligence."
"We track salaries or paychecks of the resources. They change from time to time, such as every six months or every year. If they can come up with a default or out-of-the-box feature to manage those multiple payable costs so that we can automatically calculate the project costs rolled up. That would be the coolest feature that we can expect from ServiceNow. We would like to have an automatic feature to manage the payable costs. We should be able to manage or maintain multiple pay costs so that while calculating the project roll-up costs for individual projects, the respective pay costs in a particular period are picked up automatically from the backend. Currently, we have to customize that. It is doable. We have done it but through customization."
"Dashboard interface is limited functionally and not very user friendly"
"The interface isn't user-friendly."
"The solution needs a few things in terms of resource management."
More ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Asana is ranked 3rd in Project Management Software with 43 reviews while ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management is ranked 3rd in Project Portfolio Management with 27 reviews. Asana is rated 8.4, while ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Asana writes "Extremely stable, user-friendly, and easy to navigate". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management writes "A very strategic demand management tool that visualizes risks and ratings in a bubble chart". Asana is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Microsoft Project, Wrike, monday.com and Bitrix24, whereas ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Jira, Jira Align, Microsoft Project Server and Adobe Workfront. See our Asana vs. ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management report.
See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors.
We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.