We performed a comparison between Atlassian SourceTree and GitHub based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Version Control solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is the ability to fix a broken repository merge."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The interface is very good and is easy to use. It tells you when you've committed, when you've uploaded, and gives you the differences."
"The solution's initial setup process is straightforward."
"Even if I'm not in the office, I can access and work on my code from anywhere with my account credentials."
"I find the most valuable collaboration between our peers to be a seamless collaboration between our peers. We can connect and change our code, allowing us to be agile in our projects. Since we're talking about DevOps, we're using Jenkins in our pipeline. It helps speed up the process by automating the DevOps workflow."
"The Projects Tab, which shows you the todo list and the progress for projects, is very helpful."
"The most valuable feature is help offered by the community for open-source projects."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is the version control field."
"This product is very good for storing and versioning code."
"We are finding GitHub is very stable."
"I use this solution to store my code in a repository so we can manage version control which is useful."
"The product's UI needs improvement."
"For everyday use, I am more comfortable using the command line interface, rather than using SourceTree."
"Its interface could be easy to understand for a programmer."
"I have had a food experience with Atlassian SourceTree but it might not be for everyone."
"There can be conflict issues when two developers work on the same file or line of code, and it would be great to see that improved, possibly with an AI solution."
"It is difficult to merge a code or restore it to an older version."
"GitHub could expand the limits of the free version."
"The onboarding process could be simplified."
"It would be better if the amount of storage were increased."
"It is currently only from the development perspective. It doesn't have features related to project management and testing. It is not like Azure. So, there is a lot of room for improvement. It is a version control product, and it would be good if they can come up with a complete DevOps product."
"There is a bit of a learning curve."
"The project management sector really needs some improvement for GitHub. I don't know if GitHub made sense for me as a project manager."
Atlassian SourceTree is ranked 6th in Version Control with 5 reviews while GitHub is ranked 3rd in Version Control with 74 reviews. Atlassian SourceTree is rated 7.2, while GitHub is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Atlassian SourceTree writes "An easy-to-setup solution, but its documentation could be better for technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of GitHub writes "Beneficial version control and continuous integration, but guides would be helpful". Atlassian SourceTree is most compared with Git, Bitbucket, Bitbucket Server and AWS CodeCommit, whereas GitHub is most compared with Snyk, AWS CodeCommit, Fortify on Demand, Bitbucket and Checkmarx One. See our Atlassian SourceTree vs. GitHub report.
See our list of best Version Control vendors.
We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.