We performed a comparison between AWS CodeCommit and GitHub based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Version Control solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."AWS CodeCommit is simple and cheap."
"AWS CodeCommit is much easier to use than Bitbucket. It doesn't require any personal password or these things. We just need to put in our AWS account password and username."
"It helps us to install our code idea projects."
"We use GitHub instead of our regular shared drive. It offers instant access to shared folders as well as good security."
"GitHub provides good time reduction and this is what I value the most."
"Even if I'm not in the office, I can access and work on my code from anywhere with my account credentials."
"This product allows us to easily collaborate on development tasks with our subcontractors, and control the workflow as the project progresses."
"The ease of use is valuable."
"During our use of GitHub, we have not encountered any problems and GitHub adds new features frequently."
"I find the most valuable collaboration between our peers to be a seamless collaboration between our peers. We can connect and change our code, allowing us to be agile in our projects. Since we're talking about DevOps, we're using Jenkins in our pipeline. It helps speed up the process by automating the DevOps workflow."
"The solution has been stable for us."
"The solution could be more user-friendly and cheaper."
"There are some options in Bitbucket that are not available in AWS CodeCommit. For example, code reviewer. We can't add a code reviewer in AWS CodeCommit, and we can't fork the repository online. These are the two things that Bitbucket has, but the solution doesn't have. Also, Jira has a debugging option that AWS CodeCommit doesn't have. Another thing is that Bitbucket charges three dollars per month per user. Compared with AWS CodeCommit, that only charges one dollar per month. So, AWS CodeCommit is cheaper than Bitbucket. But it does not have enough features that Bitbucket has. Additionally, it will be good if you upload one video or documentation on how to use AWS CodeCommit for beginners. That will be more helpful. There you can add more details about pricing. There are not many details about pricing. Bitbucket has a table where they have mentioned everything in detail, like, what features for how much price, how much longer you can use and how many users can use."
"The tool should improve its UI."
"The GitHub repository needs an upgraded user interface and overall UI improvements."
"The solution can improve by adding video guides, official guides, or short courses that cater to beginners who are new to the system. These resources could offer step-by-step guidance on how to use GitHub, including common procedures such as pulling and committing. Currently, many of us have to resort to searching for information on how to do these tasks via Google. An official guide provided by GitHub itself would be a valuable asset to newcomers and would save them time and effort."
"The merging features can be improved."
"Though I haven't done much research, GitHub lacks in providing more functions like GitLab."
"The initial setup and implementation could be easier, I had some difficulties with it at first but I don't have a development background."
"The user interface on GitLab is better."
"Lacks sufficient support in terms of professional services that could be provided."
"I would like to see more security where a plugin was available for us to update in relation to security."
AWS CodeCommit is ranked 5th in Version Control with 3 reviews while GitHub is ranked 3rd in Version Control with 74 reviews. AWS CodeCommit is rated 7.4, while GitHub is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of AWS CodeCommit writes "Offers convenient and cost-effective version control but lacks some advanced features and integration options ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of GitHub writes "Beneficial version control and continuous integration, but guides would be helpful". AWS CodeCommit is most compared with Bitbucket, Atlassian SourceTree and Bitbucket Server, whereas GitHub is most compared with Snyk, Fortify on Demand, Bitbucket, Atlassian SourceTree and Checkmarx One. See our AWS CodeCommit vs. GitHub report.
See our list of best Version Control vendors.
We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
