We performed a comparison between Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus and Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is the analysis, because of the beta structure."
"The stability is very good."
"The setup is pretty simple."
"We have FortiEDR installed on all our systems. This protects them from any threats."
"It is stable and scalable."
"Ability to get forensics details and also memory exfiltration."
"Additionally, when it comes to EDR, there are more tools available to assist with client work."
"Forensics is a valuable feature of Fortinet FortiEDR."
"Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus is highly stable."
"The best thing about Bitdefender is that it has got top-notch features and it is not tied to specific countries like some other antivirus tools."
"It never fails. Bitdefender always catches all of the viruses that have been detected on customer sites."
"I find Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus to be a pretty good solution for the mid-level market, specifically for organizations with up to two hundred fifty users. I like that it is an averagely priced solution. It also has a straightforward installation that can be completed within three to five minutes. Its technical support is also good enough."
"It is a scalable solution...It is a stable solution."
"Has some great features not available elsewhere."
"The performance for Kaspersky is good, and it's not impacted our client performance."
"Its customer service is quite good."
"This solution is quite responsive and the tech support engineers are kind and good."
"My impression of the stability of this solution is good. We have not had any issues with stability."
"The most valuable feature of Kaspersky EDR is its simplicity. The console is easy to use and not very complex."
"The product has an easy-to-use EDR module based on signature-based antivirus detection. It is a complete software."
More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert Pros →
"I would like the solution to extend beyond endpoint protection and include other attack surfaces such as other network components."
"The solution's installation from a central installation server could be improved because the engineers had a little bit of trouble getting it installed from a central location."
"FortiEDR could add a separate scanning dashboard. In incident management, we prefer to remove the endpoint system from the environment and scan the system. We typically use Symantec for that, but if we want to use FortiEDR for that, then we need a scanning tab to clarify things."
"We'd like to see more one-to-one product presentations for the distribution channels."
"Making the portal mobile friendly would be helpful when I am out of office."
"There's room for improvement in the quick response time and technical support for integration issues, especially when dealing with multiple vendors."
"They can include the automation for the realtime updates. We have a network infrastructure with remote sites. Whenever they send updates, they are not automated. We have to go into the console and push those updates. I wish it was more automated. The update file is currently around 31 MB. It could be smaller."
"Detections could be improved."
"The mobile version needs improvement."
"The solution seems to be pretty amateur for an EDR solution, and it should be more in sync in terms of features, with solutions such as FireEye and SentinelOne."
"Adding a feature like Data Loss Prevention would be beneficial."
"The prices can go down a little bit."
"Documentation needs to be simplified and improved so that it provides good product awareness for end users."
"I would like better integration with other products."
"They could provide a source of visualization for the product."
"Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is very heavy on the system resources. It uses a lot of memory and the system can become slow."
"It consumes many system resources."
"My opinion is that behavior detection could work better. This feature gets a high rate of false positives."
"If it covered more products, it would improve the XDR."
More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert Cons →
More Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert Pricing and Cost Advice →
Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus is ranked 54th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 4 reviews while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is ranked 17th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 44 reviews. Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus is rated 7.6, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus writes "Averagely priced, has a straightforward installation, and worth recommending to the mid-level market, but its performance needs improvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert writes "Solid security and performance; overall a useful tool". Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus is most compared with HP Wolf Security, CrowdStrike Falcon, Open EDR, Darktrace and Trend Vision One, whereas Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is most compared with Trend Vision One, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Cynet, IBM Security QRadar and Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS). See our Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert report.
See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.