We performed a comparison between Celonis and QPR ProcessAnalyzer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Process Mining solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution has very detailed documentation for technical items so it is very easy for developers to use."
"In my opinion, it's quite an advanced tool."
"The real-time replication was just implemented and is quite useful."
"For the amount of information that it processes, it works relatively fast. I like the visual presentation and the interface is intuitive. I also like that Celonis has a learning academy."
"find Action Engine for notifying the user, and also Studio Spark, and knowledge models; all these features are useful."
"The solution offers a very good user interface."
"Its usage is relatively straightforward after the UI is set up. There's a lot of pre-built analysis that can be utilized, which saves a lot of time. Overall, it is a good product."
"The most valuable features are process mining, task mining, business analytics, and machine learning."
"Discovery and root cause analysis"
"I have found the most valuable features of QPR ProcessAnalyzer to be Process Discovery, KPIs, definition, and dashboarding. These are the main features we are working on."
"Celonis is a little more expensive than UiPath. Maybe they can work on making it less expensive."
"In the next release, I would like for them to integrate more custom features to ease the process of having multiple solutions. I would like to be able to integrate it with other solutions."
"We want to see its linkage to Robotic Process Automation. We would also like to see how can it lead to the implementation side and whether the transition is smooth."
"The UI could be improved."
"The product must focus on training for low-code and no-code people."
"Similar to what SAP is doing with S/4HANA, Celonis should allow business users to create their own analytics tab. In my previous organization, business analysts were the only ones who were actively building these reports with Celonis, whereas SAP platforms are now allowing the business users to create their own reports with graphics and all other things based on the data that is presented. This is one thing that Celonis needs. Currently, just the technical teams are doing that. Sometimes, when we were looking at five years of data, it used to take up to 3 seconds. It wasn't bad, but we had to wait a little bit. It probably also had to do with the server. I don't know if it can be used on mobile devices. If not, that will be the way to go. They should mobilize it to allow people to see these reports on their mobile devices."
"The technical support is very bad."
"The tool must have better process graphs."
"Communication with clients could be improved."
"The user interface of QPR ProcessAnalyzer could improve, it is not very intuitive."
Earn 20 points
Celonis is ranked 1st in Process Mining with 44 reviews while QPR ProcessAnalyzer is ranked 15th in Process Mining. Celonis is rated 8.4, while QPR ProcessAnalyzer is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Celonis writes "Great process mining, process discovery, and opportunity identification". On the other hand, the top reviewer of QPR ProcessAnalyzer writes "Useful dashboards, plenty of features, and initial setup simple". Celonis is most compared with SAP Signavio Process Manager, UiPath Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, Software AG ARIS Process Mining and IBM Process Mining, whereas QPR ProcessAnalyzer is most compared with SAP Signavio Process Intelligence. See our Celonis vs. QPR ProcessAnalyzer report.
See our list of best Process Mining vendors.
We monitor all Process Mining reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.