We performed a comparison between Check Point Harmony Endpoint and Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Comparison Results: Check Point Harmony is the winner in this comparison. It is a powerful and flexible solution that is easy to deploy. Kaspersky does come out on top in the pricing category, however.
"The solution was relatively easy to deploy."
"It is a scalable solution...The initial setup of Fortinet FortiEDR was straightforward."
"he solution is an anti-malware product that integrates well with other vendor products such as firewalls, SIEM, etc. It captures threat intelligence and gives you better visibility. The product also has sandboxing features."
"Ability to get forensics details and also memory exfiltration."
"Forensics is a valuable feature of Fortinet FortiEDR."
"The ease of deployment and configuration is valuable. It's very easy compared to other vendors like Sophos. Sophos' configuration is complex. Fortinet is a lot easier to understand. You don't need a lot of admin knowledge to do the configuration."
"Exceptions are easy to create and the interface is easy to follow with a nice appearance."
"The product detects and blocks threats and is more proactive than firewalls."
"Check Point Harmony Endpoint can be easily deployed and is cost effective and more secure."
"They have a great knowledge base that you can leverage as a user."
"The solution has good threat intelligence features."
"The graphical interface is very easy to use and intuitive, which greatly facilitates the work and greatly facilitates the work and the location of threats on the users' computers."
"It's pretty complete for preventing threats to endpoints. Its capabilities are great."
"I found the fact of working across multiple attack vectors easy and more beneficial."
"We now feel more secure with our PCs, even more with the non-technical persons."
"Administratively, it's easy to control."
"I like that Kaspersky isn't heavy."
"They have a very good reporting system and they have a very good dashboard for the administrator, which makes monitoring everything easy."
"One of the most valuable features is that it's quite secure. I'm satisfied with this solution."
"I am impressed with the tool's main dashboard, anti-malware application blocking, DDoS, etc."
"Easy to deploy, easy to use, and has a good detection rate."
"It allows for a solid form of risk management as well as a measure of remote device management."
"The solution is secure."
"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that the application control is very good."
"Integration with Azure and SaaS provisioning tools could improve Fortinet FortiEDR."
"I think cloud security and SASE are areas of concern in the product where improvements are required. The tool's cloud version has to be improved in terms of the security it offers."
"I would like the solution to extend beyond endpoint protection and include other attack surfaces such as other network components."
"The dashboard isn't easy to access and manage."
"The solution should address emerging threats like SQL injection."
"Once, we had an event that was locked and blocked, but information about it came to us two or three days later."
"The SIEM could be improved."
"The security should be strong for the cloud. Some applications are on-prem and some are on the cloud. Fortinet should also have strong security for the cloud. There should be more security for the cloud."
"Tech Support must be better."
"The next release should consider a strong threat detection mechanism that can categorize various levels of attacks for faster analysis."
"We have observed some policies are not working as expected."
"The solution could be improved in the future with a way to provide online training to customers for free, as other providers do."
"We would like to make the documentation for more modern solutions like the Harmony family easier to find."
"One area of this product that has room for improvement is the disc encryption."
"The network monitoring features must be improved."
"The remote deployment with Check Point Endpoint Security requires improvement. We have to depend on some of their deployment tools. I would like a system endpoint protection management tool or a remote deployment tool."
"It is hard to maintain the software and upgrade."
"The company needs to keep developing more security measures to help keep its customers safe. If they could keep adding to security features, it would be ideal."
"I would like to see better-enhanced features, such as protection against ransomware and different types of malicious malware."
"They should continue to put more security measures in place in order to make it more robust."
"Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business could improve the flexibility of use."
"I think it would be good for them to consider and cloud integration capabilities."
"We would like it so that if a user uses it on-premises, the server should use fewer hardware resources."
"Maybe the solution's monitoring could be improved with more dashboards, so there's no back and forth, back and forth."
More Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point Harmony Endpoint is ranked 8th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 103 reviews while Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is ranked 12th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 111 reviews. Check Point Harmony Endpoint is rated 8.8, while Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Check Point Harmony Endpoint writes "Excellent anti-ransomware protection, zero-day phishing protection, and web browsing filtering". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business writes "Easy to setup, stable and good security use cases". Check Point Harmony Endpoint is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, SentinelOne Singularity Complete and Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, whereas Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Fortinet FortiClient, CrowdStrike Falcon, ESET Endpoint Protection Platform and Trend Micro Apex One. See our Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors and best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.