We performed a comparison between Check Point Remote Access VPN and TeamViewer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Remote Access solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"The most important feature of Check Point Remote Access VPN is the multiple factor authentication."
"The solution offers high scalability as far as adding more users."
"Technical support has been excellent."
"The clients of the customers have a facility to access the enterprise network."
"One of the most outstanding features is the ability to deliver third-party services and achieve double authenticity with integrated identities."
"We have more control over the activity that users have on the internal network, thanks to the monitoring offered by Check Point and the security provided by the gateway."
"Check Point Remote Access VPN enables us to access on-premise applications while working from remote locations."
"The product is easy to install."
"The product allows easy access to any system in case of any issues."
"It's a user-friendly product."
"The most valuable features of TeamViewer are the high performance and it is not complicated to use, neither for me nor for the one I'm helping."
"This is a unique solution that is very easy to install."
"The most valuable feature of TeamViewer is the remote access connection. Additionally, it is easy to use."
"TeamViewer is a scalable solution."
"From my perspective, the most important is the login."
"For Linux machines, they don't have a full client to install. For the users that utilize Linux, there needs to be an equivalent."
"There is always room for innovation and the addition of new features."
"Check Point Remote Access VPN's enterprise support could be improved."
"We would like to see support for a layer seven VPN over UDP."
"They need to increase their timeout. Right now, it will fail after ten seconds, however, it shouldn't fail until after 20 seconds."
"They could add more features, like the security to block off the doors, or create another hatch, something like this. They could make the features safer, add malware to make my mail and the Kryon system safer and to protect data at an earlier stage."
"There was complexity in the initial setup."
"Bug Fixes and enhancement requests should be remediated earlier."
"The support could improve their speed."
"You can't configure multiple, unattended control passwords on the Mac. On the Mac, there's only one. On Windows, there are multiple unattended control passwords. I have people in different departments. My infrastructure people need to control a server and my developers may need to go into that same server. But I don't want them to have the same password... on the Mac, it can be done but it's extremely clunky and problematic."
"Considering the earlier versions of the product, I think TeamViewer used to slow down the systems."
"The stability of TeamViewer is good, but it could be better."
"It should have ability to display notes in the computer list."
"I'm not sure if they provide good quality audio alongside screensharing."
"Every now and then you'll get a silent crash and you relaunch the application. But it happens no more than with anything else in the Windows environment."
"TeamViewer has a legacy and may not be using the latest UI trends."
More Check Point Remote Access VPN Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point Remote Access VPN is ranked 5th in Remote Access with 61 reviews while TeamViewer is ranked 1st in Remote Access with 85 reviews. Check Point Remote Access VPN is rated 8.8, while TeamViewer is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Check Point Remote Access VPN writes "Is easy to use and has a nice interface, but the scalability needs to improve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TeamViewer writes "Solid cross-platform remote control, but with kludgy central management and some serious feature issues on macOS". Check Point Remote Access VPN is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, Check Point Harmony Mobile, Fortinet FortiClient and Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, whereas TeamViewer is most compared with TeamViewer Tensor, Microsoft Remote Desktop Services, Parallels Access, ISL Online and HelpWire. See our Check Point Remote Access VPN vs. TeamViewer report.
See our list of best Remote Access vendors.
We monitor all Remote Access reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.