We performed a comparison between Datadog and HPE OneView based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I really enjoy the RUM monitoring features of Datadog. It allows us to monitor user behavior in a way we couldn't before."
"We have a better grasp of what is occurring during the deployment cycle. If something fails, we have an idea what has failed, where it has failed, and how it failed to better mitigate the situation."
"Datadog has a lot of features to be able to drill down deep into the swath of logs that our platforms generate."
"Datadog has given us near-live visibility across our entire cloud platform."
"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the APM."
"The most valuable features have been: Sharable dashboards, TimeBoards, dogstatsd API, Slack Integration, Event logging API. CloudTrail Events, Tags, alerts, and anomaly detection. EBS Volume Snapshot Age, which they added upon request."
"The integration and configuration are incredibly simple. The SaaS offering is remarkably easy to set up, especially if you're coming from a Graphite environment or anything that uses a StatsD."
"The observability on offer is the most useful aspect of the product."
"The solution's technical support was great...The initial setup of HPE OneView was easy."
"The remote support automatically logs service calls and support cases with HPE, which is really good."
"The solution's initial setup process was easy...The technical support is good...It is a stable product, and we will use it for a long time."
"The most valuable features are the composable structure, infrastructure, and automation."
"Comprehensive dashboard, ease of use are key features."
"Broad range of tools to create executive and operations dashboards."
"Firmware compliance is one of the most valuable features."
"Provides the strongest support for automation."
"We would like to see smaller or shorter tutorials and video sessions."
"Could be a little more user friendly."
"We primarily use the log management functionality, and the only feedback I have there is better fuzzy text searching in logs (the kind that Kibana has)."
"Datadog could make their use cases more visible either through their docs or tutorial videos."
"The product could be improved by providing remote control to agents, enabling them to execute automation and collections without requiring another automation tool or integration."
"One thing we have run into is that it is so easy to add monitoring that we turn on things without really understanding the costs."
"It lacks consistency in the APIs."
"It could use some additional features when working with metrics like Grafana or like New Relic has. Datadog does not use library technologies like Dynatrace does. Datadog has machine learning too, but it does not have this option in all layers of monitoring like infrastructure service process in applications."
"Use it, but do not think it is going into the clouds, because it is not. There is room for improvement."
"Those features, coming in version 4, that we're looking for are the discovery, primarily. But I think the scope-based access control is of interest, although, we didn't see any directory integration, so that, in itself, seems like it's still limited."
"The speed and performance of the solution are areas where the product lacks and needs improvement."
"The solution's console can be improved by making it more user-friendly and adding the capability to filter the reports out using only the information required."
"Technical support is not very good. The engineers do not know a lot about the product, even when asked simplistic questions."
"I would like to see support for things that aren't in the current generation. We have a lot of 7th and 8th generation hardware."
"We've had issues, for example, with RAM."
"There was a feature called HPE cloud manager, but now it is owned by Micro Focus. HPE should make a cloud optimizer again."
Datadog is ranked 2nd in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 137 reviews while HPE OneView is ranked 17th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 80 reviews. Datadog is rated 8.6, while HPE OneView is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Datadog writes "Very good RUM, synthetics, and infrastructure host maps". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HPE OneView writes "Provides firmware compliance and the ability to connect to iPO". Datadog is most compared with Dynatrace, Azure Monitor, New Relic, AWS X-Ray and Elastic Observability, whereas HPE OneView is most compared with Cisco Intersight, Dell CloudIQ, Zabbix, Lenovo XClarity Orchestrator and ServiceNow IT Operations Management. See our Datadog vs. HPE OneView report.
See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.