We performed a comparison between Dynatrace and ScienceLogic based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two AIOps solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Reduces the amount of knowledge that is needed by applications consuming this data."
"We spend less time investing in problems. We can spend more time on developing new projects."
"PurePaths. The ability to see the transaction flow of the web request. It's valuable because our developers, when we have an issue, they can drill down to see exactly where in the application, the call in the application; where the high response time is, or where something is wrong."
"Dynatrace is an extremely helpful APM solution in large, complex environments, whenever we need to have an integrated vision of our users, infrastructure, and applications."
"Through end-user monitoring, we were able to measure the user's perceived performance and build an SLA based on that information."
"It's great tool for building dashboards related to application performance."
"The vendor team who did the setup was very good. They sent a very skillful resource for the setup."
"The way it shows a problem on the dashboard is pretty good."
"It has good monitoring capabilities across cloud environments, data centers, and hybrid environments."
"The most valuable features of ScienceLogic are AI and machine learning."
"The power flow is great."
"I'm satisfied with ScienceLogicfor for what they can offer today because they can offer both serverless connectivity and agent connectivity."
"One of the valuable features is rapid dashboards."
"The tool is quite easy to deploy, and it offers very good support."
"It is very easy to configure because we are using an agent-less version. You can very quickly implement a collector for monitoring device servers."
"Provides agentless monitoring so there's no need to install the agent on each server."
"We have had to resolve a lot of things and had a lot of issues with the tool."
"They've leveraged those security gateways and renamed them ActiveGates, and now there are different web plugins we can run on it... Sometimes the development of those seems to be running very fast and it's not complete. They don't yet function quite as easily as the OneAgents do. But I have hopes that that's going to get better. We have tried the MQ, the Citrix, and the Oracle ActiveGate plugins. They could be sharper. It's the right direction to go. It just seems like it could be smoother."
"The solution could improve by allowing more dashboards customization. This would allow us to monitor the metric better."
"It needs improvement with proprietary protocols for the DC RUM part."
"There is still a bit of redundancy in Dynatrace."
"I need more experience."
"We're thinking about moving to Dynatrace because AppMon is not scaling for us."
"Dynatrace has been difficult to set up and use to diagnose problems in the past due to the complex nature of the tool."
"It doesn't have the complete application-level topology. It could have service topology and business service monitoring. I would like to see how business service monitoring will function with agent-based installation, and how flexible and business-oriented it is for service modeling and service infrastructure. I have a lot of experience in using business service monitoring, service topology, and service hierarchy functionalities in similar products from BMC and Micro Focus (OpenView), and I want to see how these functionalities will look like in ScienceLogic."
"There are often bugs in new releases."
"We want to understand: how does the back end work? What if some problem occurs? What we can do? They need to provide more information."
"Admins do not have direct access to the reporting."
"I would like to see out-of-the-box standard dashboards for common services."
"They should add CLI command modes and scripts for high performance."
"ScienceLogic does not have application monitoring. We definitely need something integrated within ScienceLogic to monitor applications so that we don't have to rely on monitoring tools to monitor other applications. At least the ones that are market leaders, such as SAP, Oracle, and others."
"The product's reporting functionalities have certain shortcomings, making it an area where improvements are required."
Dynatrace is ranked 2nd in AIOps with 341 reviews while ScienceLogic is ranked 5th in AIOps with 42 reviews. Dynatrace is rated 8.8, while ScienceLogic is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Dynatrace writes "AI identifies all the components of a response-time issue or failure, hugely benefiting our triage efforts". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ScienceLogic writes "Great integrations, power flow, and good support". Dynatrace is most compared with Datadog, New Relic, AppDynamics, Splunk Enterprise Security and Azure Monitor, whereas ScienceLogic is most compared with LogicMonitor, SolarWinds NPM, Datadog, Zabbix and ServiceNow Discovery. See our Dynatrace vs. ScienceLogic report.
See our list of best AIOps vendors.
We monitor all AIOps reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.