We performed a comparison between IBM Maximo and nlyte based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, IFS, Infor and others in Enterprise Asset Management (EAM)."I have found Work Order management the most valuable feature. Additionally, it is a very robust and powerful solution."
"Maximo is very stable. We really do not have problem with stability."
"We are very thankful to have IBM integrated with our own Legacy cloud-based system"
"The most valuable features are the ability to create work orders and preventative maintenance."
"Preventive maintenance management."
"The most valuable features of IBM Maximo are the overall power and interface, and there are a lot of different modules that we use that are helpful. Additionally, it's an integrated solution and it has a lot of capabilities."
"IBM Maximo is the best software for assets management."
"The incident management feature is good because it allows you to keep track of and classify issues."
"The power management aspect of nlyte provides a comprehensive overview of power consumption and forecasting capabilities. It allows for strategic planning, such as assessing the impact of adding new racks with specific power requirements. This feature facilitates considerations not only for power consumption but also for thermal aspects, including airflow dynamics between hot and cold aisles. In essence, the most advantageous feature of nlyte sfor us lies in its power management capabilities."
"There are always ways to improve and make things better."
"The latest version is slow due to the power it requires."
"Although you can create notifications with Maximo, the configuration and options could be improved."
"Could use some alignment regarding some standards and the tracking of the IT assets. Even though they have all of the information (i.e. where are the assets, who owns the asset, etc.), they were not mapping it to different cyber standards."
"Coding can be complex when customization is required."
"Maximo is a big system, so the initial setup is complex."
"The solution is not stable. We can have one day when it is stable and another day it is not. Sometimes it crashes or becomes very slow, and there are times we are not even able to download all the databases. Without the database, we cannot work on that application. These are the small glitches, and stability issues we are facing."
"Revision management of file attachments."
"Nylte is quite intricate to use. Training someone to navigate the platform would likely require a substantial investment, ranging from one to two months for basic proficiency, followed by an additional two to three months of consistent use to gain full proficiency. Despite its complexity, I believe there is room for simplification, making it more user-friendly. While there have been improvements, there is potential for further enhancements in this area."
IBM Maximo is ranked 1st in Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) with 23 reviews while nlyte is ranked 10th in Data Center Infrastructure Management with 1 review. IBM Maximo is rated 8.0, while nlyte is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of IBM Maximo writes "Work order management and scalability enables the businesses' needs to be met". On the other hand, the top reviewer of nlyte writes "A Software Solution synchronizing information and activities to other systems that depend on accurate physical infrastructure information". IBM Maximo is most compared with ServiceNow, JIRA Service Management, ABB Ability Asset Suite EAM, IFS Cloud Platform and NetSuite ERP, whereas nlyte is most compared with Schneider Electric EcoStruxure IT, Device42 and Sunbird DCIM.
We monitor all Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.