We performed a comparison between ITRS Geneos and Prometheus based on real PeerSpot user reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Comparison Results: Prometheus is the preferred choice over ITRS Geneos due to its integration capabilities, affordability, and flexibility. Despite ITRS Geneos' comprehensive monitoring and alert management solution, it lacks thread-level monitoring and is not as lightweight. Prometheus is highly praised for its fast data storage system, scraping mechanism, and ability to extract data from multiple sources. It is also free and has a good return on investment, making it a valuable investment for monitoring needs.
"Tons of default modules which are available out of the box"
"The ability to build integrations to tools that are not monitored out of the box is the most valuable feature."
"It's also easy to implement. The implementation of Geneos is very easy and interesting. It's not complicated. It's very quick to implement. The installation is very easy. There are many topics about ITRS Geneos that explain more about the features of the function of Geneos."
"The NetProbe carries over 100 samplers which are capable of monitoring hardware, OS, and the application layer."
"I would say that it is an easy-to-use monitoring tool. Amongst the available monitoring tools, it is a really good option."
"ITRS uses SNMP to communicate with our devices as well as SNMP net probes installed on our servers."
"Geneos automatically sends email notifications when any batch job fails, the database is down or the website is down. It is automatically monitoring everything and reduces manual effort."
"The remarkable feature of Geneos is the dashboard. Geneos' flexible dashboard sets it apart from other monitoring tools. Other solutions have limitations in their dashboard design and can't be customized as much. The Geneos dashboard allows unlimited creativity."
"The product's initial setup phase is very easy."
"Prometheus provides a flexible and adjustable querying and describing time, allowing for more responsive monitoring."
"The scalability of Prometheus is very good."
"It has lots of APIs and libraries to integrate with any kind of language."
"It is a stable solution...Based on the feedback I have received from my colleagues in our company's IT department, the setup phase of the solution is relatively easy."
"It is an efficient solution."
"The most valuable features of Prometheus are the many functions available. The functions are helpful for understanding the behavior of applications and infrastructure."
"The product has an easy-to-understand interface."
"Much of the reporting outside of the user interface is very basic and requires much customization to be useful."
"There is a part of the rules for monitoring alerts. I want to understand more about how to choose the samples and the requirements for the rules. That is the part that I want to understand better and get better training for."
"Backward compatibility with deprecated features and in system documentation on what configuration areas are needed to be updated."
"Mobile phone integration is probably not as rich as it could be."
"Currently, it is difficult to monitor secure websites using SSL or with SSO enabled."
"The dashboard feature is full of bugs. Grouping items results in a distorted dashboard."
"We all look at the same things - CPU, disk space, paging stats, service status with RAG status on each. That could be provided straight out, saving significant time."
"One area where there is room for improvement is the log file. I would like to be able to do a pre-run on the log files. When you are testing log files for regular expressions, it would be good to be able to do a quick check up front on that side of things before you release that into production."
"The setup could be made easier for new users because it requires a bit of advance knowledge or experience."
"The DSL could be improved."
"The primary area where Prometheus could be improved is in terms of pricing, particularly when used with managed services."
"Its documentation could be clearer to understand."
"Prometheus requires improvement on the query side."
"Setting up the rules in Prometheus can be confusing, making it an area where improvements are required."
"There is a need for a more comprehensive overview of exporters, especially when dealing with many of them."
"When it comes to deployment, if you have no experience with something like a CI/CD pipeline, it might be a challenge."
ITRS Geneos is ranked 11th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 57 reviews while Prometheus is ranked 9th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 32 reviews. ITRS Geneos is rated 8.2, while Prometheus is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of ITRS Geneos writes "The flexible dashboard sets it apart from competing tools, but it's costly and lacks scalability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Prometheus writes "A very flexible open box that can be used vastly to do anything you need". ITRS Geneos is most compared with Dynatrace, AppDynamics, Grafana, Datadog and Splunk Enterprise Security, whereas Prometheus is most compared with Azure Monitor, New Relic, Dynatrace, Sentry and SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor. See our ITRS Geneos vs. Prometheus report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
