We performed a comparison between Datadog and ITRS Geneos based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: Datadog is recognized for its intuitive interface, wide range of integrations, and helpful problem-solving capabilities. In contrast, ITRS Geneos receives acclaim for its adaptability, ability to be personalized, and ability to monitor data in real-time, making it a versatile and robust monitoring solution. Datadog has areas for improvement in various aspects including user-friendliness, integration, user interface intuitiveness, learning curve, security features, management of organizational structure, customization flexibility, AI and ML concepts, and agent deployment. ITRS Geneos could benefit from improvements in creating dashboards and enhancing the visibility of metrics, enhancing the deployment method for upgrading, providing intelligent analysis of log files, and improving mobile app accessibility.
Service and Support: While some users appreciate the helpful and responsive support from Datadog, others have encountered slow or unresponsive assistance. ITRS Geneos is highly praised for its customer service, with immediate responses and the ability to effectively resolve any issues. However, there have been occasional instances of communication gaps and language issues with ITRS Geneos.
Ease of Deployment: Users find the initial setup for Datadog to be straightforward and relatively quick, with a duration ranging from one hour to three days, depending on the complexity. They appreciate the helpful documentation and support provided. The initial setup for ITRS Geneos is seen as complex and time-consuming, often necessitating assistance from implementation experts. While it takes only a few hours to deploy the out-of-the-box form, creating the monitoring catalog can be a lengthy process.
Pricing: User opinion varies on the setup cost of Datadog, as the pricing model lacks clarity and documentation. ITRS Geneos has a straightforward licensing model and reasonable pricing. Additional costs may apply for add-ons and server setup.
ROI: Users find that Datadog provides time savings and faster debugging, while ITRS Geneos offers benefits such as reputation, cost savings, avoidance of downtime, and improved performance indicators.
Comparison Results: Datadog is the preferred choice when comparing it to ITRS Geneos. Users appreciate Datadog's simple setup process, helpful documentation, and user-friendly interface. They also value its wide range of integrations and flexibility in monitoring and analyzing data. Datadog's performance, observability, error reporting, log centralization, and dashboard features are considered valuable.
"The single dashboard is a valuable feature."
"We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"The integration into AWS is key as well as our software is currently bound to AWS."
"The ability to easily drill down into log queries quickly and efficiently has helped us to resolve several critical incidents."
"Profiling has been made easier."
"The observability pipelines are the most valuable aspect of the solution."
"The service catalog helped improve our organization by giving a good view of the flow for our microservices applications."
"The observability on offer is the most useful aspect of the product."
"The infrastructure monitoring capabilities are really valuable. You can just log on and see everything that is happening within an IT environment."
"It has a high-level insight into the infrastructure model of the application and provides important detailed data on the host and metrics, which is the main concern of our customers."
"I always appreciate Geneos's stability and ease of use."
"This tool allows one to analyse, integrate and customize as per the systems and allows you to set your own rules."
"Real-time log monitoring with desktop alerts is valuable as it tells us immediately when there is an issue."
"Custom script toolkits"
"The great advantage of this tool is real-time monitoring."
"One of the best aspects of Geneos is that it has a broad scope and can cover a lot of use cases. You can write your own scripts to monitor really specific things. And the rules that you can put in place can be quite complex for the alerts."
"Tons of default modules which are available out of the box"
"In my experience, being able to monitor our databases is a valuable feature as we can create our own queries and aren't reliant on the in-built ones."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"The technical support needs improvement."
"The logging could be improved in the future."
"We have contact with many customers that cover many areas, so we have cases where the infrastructure administration could be improved."
"The ease of implementation needs improvement."
"Auto instrumentation on tracing has not been very easy to find in the documentation."
"Datadog could improve the flexibility with AI and ML concepts. This will allow customers to be more leveraged towards publishing."
"The correlation between the logs and the metrics needs improvement as most cases, we might use another logging tool (that is cheaper in cost) which we then have to link together."
"I've only been using Datadog for a few months, and at first, it was frankly overwhelming in terms of both the UI and the available capabilities."
"At times, it can be hard to generate metrics out of logs."
"A lightweight version which could host more than 100 gateways, as we can see slowness while loading all our gateways."
"I would like better access to the data that is being collected."
"The main feature that needs work is the Dashboard designer."
"We all look at the same things - CPU, disk space, paging stats, service status with RAG status on each. That could be provided straight out, saving significant time."
"The ITA, the post-incident analytics, could be improved."
"Sometimes, if there is a lot of data coming onto the servers, we have observed a little bit of slowness on the gateway servers which are doing the ITRS dashboard monitoring."
"I would like to see ITRS integrate its setup editor with a SVN to check-in setup XML after major changes."
"Backward compatibility with deprecated features and in system documentation on what configuration areas are needed to be updated."
More Juniper Mist Premium Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
Datadog is ranked 1st in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 137 reviews while ITRS Geneos is ranked 11th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 57 reviews. Datadog is rated 8.6, while ITRS Geneos is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Datadog writes "Very good RUM, synthetics, and infrastructure host maps". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ITRS Geneos writes "The flexible dashboard sets it apart from competing tools, but it's costly and lacks scalability". Datadog is most compared with Dynatrace, Azure Monitor, New Relic, AWS X-Ray and AppDynamics, whereas ITRS Geneos is most compared with Dynatrace, AppDynamics, Grafana, Prometheus and Splunk Enterprise Security. See our Datadog vs. ITRS Geneos report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors, best Network Monitoring Software vendors, and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.