We performed a comparison between JD Edwards EnterpriseOne and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ERP solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Flexibility is the most valuable aspect of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne because it allows customization."
"It’s a stable product."
"We did not have any problems with the scalability of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne."
"I have found the solutions best features to be financial procurement, inventory, and manufacturing."
"The solution’s Accounts Payable and Procurement modules are the most stable and quite useful compared to other finance modules."
"It has simplified the process completely, and even though it has many features which are available in the market now, but it is on par with the other ERPs that are available in the market now."
"The most valuable feature of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is the flashback it quickly takes you to the data browser. Additionally, one of the newer tools is the orchestrator which is very good."
"It is very straightforward to deploy and set up."
"For me, the main strengths of Microsoft Dynamics NAV are that it's user-friendly and light. These are its major wins. I have used other ERPs and their architecture were a little more complex when compared to the Microsoft Dynamics NAV architecture."
"The product is customizable so we can tune it according to our requirements."
"This is readily available and affordable, as well as user-friendly and simple to use in my opinion."
"I have found the flexibility to be very valuable. It's highly flexible, and at least for us, it has been effective. It is also highly functional."
"Microsoft Dynamics NAV is brilliant and it's a different segment when comparing it with Dynamics AX. Dynamics AX is a larger product with much more features and it's aimed at a different segment of the market."
"Our data is much more manageable than before."
"All of the features are valuable, depending on where you implement them. I've done implementations in 60 countries, across 86 different companies and groups, and each company has a different reason for why they want to use it. Every single feature that I've implemented has been successful, and for some companies, where they didn't use the functionality, they have moved to external products or they've integrated into other applications."
"The initial setup is easy - because it stands on Microsoft offerings, it's simple and intuitive to use."
"Something that could be included is a supply chain management system. That's what we're looking for."
"They have the interface with Hubble and other reporting, however, we just want that to be a part of JD Edwards."
"The way of creating daily reports could be made a little bit easier."
"What would make JD Edwards EnterpriseOne better is more straightforward project implementation, including reducing the costs associated with upgrading projects."
"The only issue with the solution that it yet to consider improvements in its price."
"The initial setup was complex...One should get the end-user manual because, in some parts, JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is not user-friendly."
"Originally, there were some complications with implementation."
"We’d like to see technical support integrated within the application so that it is not required to raise additional incidents or do manual outreach to support."
"As our company grew we had to switch from Microsoft Dynamics NAV to a solution that was suited for larger-sized companies."
"Microsoft Dynamics NAV will be replaced with Office 365 in the future."
"I would like to improve the tool’s reporting and coding part."
"If Microsoft made some of the security setups a little easier to work with, that would be a significant improvement. The warehouse management features could also use some work. We had to buy third-party software to make NAV's warehouse management and security more usable and functional."
"They need to improve their processes."
"In Thailand, the support here could be better. The process to get an answer is too long."
"The solution's event management can be improved."
"There are some aspects of the solution that is complex."
More Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central Pricing and Cost Advice →
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is ranked 7th in ERP with 55 reviews while Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central is ranked 3rd in ERP with 62 reviews. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is rated 8.2, while Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne writes "Simplifies processes, is easy to set up, and offers good integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central writes "Easy to deploy, extremely stable, and highly scalable". JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is most compared with JD Edwards World, SAP ERP, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, PeopleSoft and NetSuite ERP, whereas Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central is most compared with SAP S/4HANA, Microsoft Dynamics AX, SAP Business One, SAP ERP and Sage Business Cloud Enterprise Management. See our JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs. Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central report.
See our list of best ERP vendors and best Activity Based Costing Software vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.