We performed a comparison between KerioControl and Sophos XG based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Firewalls solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The user interface is relatively easy. The devices are easy to deploy and figure out when you have experience with other security appliances."
"Customers are more inclined towards FortiGate because of application control, web filtering, and anti-spam features. The support from the FortiGate team is good, and price-wise, it is affordable."
"The payment function for applications is good."
"The most important feature, normally for small business customers, is link load balancing."
"The solution is very user friendly. The user interface in particular is quite nice."
"Provides good firewall security and has great VPN features."
"This is an easy solution to deploy."
"The solution has very good threat and content filtering switches."
"Instead of using a cloud-based product for accessing information, and putting my data at risk in the cloud and in someone else's hands, it has allowed me to use a VPN and access my data directly from a laptop when I am out in the field. That has made my life a lot easier, where I'm able to access any information I need to be able access, basically on demand, with an Internet connection. That alone has been great."
"The firewall appliance itself is the most valuable feature."
"All of the features of Kerio Control are equally good. Most valuable to us are the firewall rules, the intrusion detection system, and IP address features."
"Kerio Control is easy to use and provides the ability to deliver customized solutions."
"One thing we use quite a lot, as well, is the DHCP Server, because we do a lot of work where all our devices need to have static IP addresses. Rather than going around and configuring every box, we do it all through DHCP reservations. It's easier. We've got a record of it. We can manipulate it if we need to change something or change some hardware. It's all easy. Even guys who are not used to using it can pick it up quite quickly."
"The top features are ones that we're not using yet but we soon will be because we've just had broadband upgraded in Australia. We've got something called the National Broadband Network, which is forced onto you, so you have to take it when it arrives. We'll be trying the high availability out soon. We tried that with some load balancing, it didn't quite work as we expected, but I think that was more of a configuration thing rather than a product thing."
"I did not face any issues with stability while using the tool's trial version."
"Its support is very good, and it is stable product."
"The user interface is very good. It's already quite simple and easy to use."
"The performance of Sophos XG is generally good and it is stable."
"Sophos is a stable solution, and we haven't had any bugs or limitations."
"We can configure rules with the user, traffic, etc., making it a very versatile solution for our network."
"The feature that we find most valuable is the VPN, which ensures that people working remotely have a secure connection."
"The product’s most valuable feature is the user management system."
"I like the web filter, application filter, and VBA."
"I particularly like the visibility it provides into network traffic, allowing us to identify and address issues efficiently."
"I feel that the reporting needs to be improved."
"It would be good if they had fewer updates."
"The cloud features and integration could be improved."
"Its reporting and pricing need improvement."
"Application management can be improved."
"The support team for Fortinet FortiGate needs to be more customer friendly."
"Fortinet FortiGate should improve the VPN tokens."
"I haven't had a single issue since using Fortinet."
"They should improve the remote connectivity feature for users."
"The Kerio hardware devices look cheap and could be improved. Some of our clients are switching to Sophos because their hardware has a more sleek design."
"I would like for them to add more security features."
"It has a VPN back to our data center but I don't think it has increased the number of VPN clients extended to those outside our environment"
"There were certain things I didn't know about it, but I've always been able to just contact our IT company. They've been able to walk me through certain things. It was quite a monumental task to set up a public site. Support really had to help me with setting up the VLANs and walk me through it. It was not possible for me to figure that out on my own, but that's what they're here for. That could have been a little bit easier laid out."
"My experience with the solutions technical support is fine but they could be faster in responding."
"The one thing that did put me off of the solution was that, after they were taken over by GFI, the licensing and a few other items have gotten very complicated."
"The VPN features are the ones that we really like, but we are using a VPN client to be able to use them. We would like to have an SSL implementation for this same feature so we don't need to install anything on the client side. That's a feature I really miss and that should really be embedded in the product. We really would love to use it via a web browser."
"I'm just a sole proprietor for IT support, and from my perspective, there could be better ways to educate a proprietor, such as myself, on how to set it up, and program it, and manage it. They do tend to have support, but a lot of times, it is for larger networks. I need something that is simpler and more rudimentary as to how to go about setting up and configuring the firewall, setting up the rules, and that type of thing. So, if there is a missing component there, that would be it."
"The vendor doesn’t publish the price on the website."
"The GUI and support could be better. I think there are other products that we are going to deploy instead of Sophos. We have already upgraded a month ago because the interfaces and support for Sophos are really weak. But other products like Juniper, Cisco, or FortiGate are better than Sophos. It's also complicated, and the end-user or client does not understand it."
"There are issues with electricity with this solution."
"The interface of Sophos XG could be improved. I would prefer the Sophos XG to have an interface for the technician who is setting it up similar to the Sophos SG. I felt the Sophos SG user interface was superior. however, in terms of the functionality of the product, Sophos XG is in many ways more powerful than the Sophos SG. I have no complaints about the quality of the product or the end result. For someone who has used both, I preferred the old interface to the new one."
"The first area that needs to be improved is customer support."
"They need to allow their solution to integrate with other products and not just other Sophos solutions."
"I am using the Azure Active Directory in my company and it was complicated to integrate this solution with Azure."
KerioControl is ranked 29th in Firewalls with 54 reviews while Sophos XG is ranked 6th in Firewalls with 192 reviews. KerioControl is rated 8.0, while Sophos XG is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of KerioControl writes "With VPN, any of our guys can log in to the system and effectively be on board; helps with our customers all over the world". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sophos XG writes "Easy to use and deploy with an improved pricing structure in place". KerioControl is most compared with Netgate pfSense, OPNsense, Sophos UTM, Cisco Secure Firewall and Fortinet FortiGate-VM, whereas Sophos XG is most compared with Netgate pfSense, OPNsense, Sophos XGS, SonicWall TZ and Sophos UTM. See our KerioControl vs. Sophos XG report.
See our list of best Firewalls vendors.
We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.