We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure Logic Apps and Oracle Integration Cloud Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."One special aspect of Azure Logic Apps is its easy integration of various applications, especially when connectors are already available. For instance, there are connectors for database applications and systems like SAP. You can drag and drop the connectors to complete your integration quickly."
"The solution's best feature is that it is compatible with the cloud and has many connectors and third-party adapters."
"The most valuable features of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps are the triggering based on certain events. You can trigger a Logic App and put your logic behind it and take certain actions. The actions could be anything based on the business logic. For example, if you say something happens, an order comes in, and the order can sit in one of the Azure services. Whenever an order comes in, the Logic App can go look and trigger an event. You can write your logic inside your Logic App and it works similar to a workflow."
"The product’s most valuable feature is integration."
"What I found most valuable in Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is that you can run a workflow or do a high-level process orchestration, then you can call the other function and fulfill the process. For example, if you want to update a customer, you first need to get the customer's phone number and simulate the steps of the process, then Microsoft Azure Logic Apps can orchestrate that process."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is the many available connectors that make automation easy. Additionally, the security of the solution is good."
"The product has efficient connectors."
"We can write external features and transfer the data using JPIMs securely which has been most valuable."
"It's very easy to get started on the solution. It's also easy to maintain, scale, and integrate according to cost factors."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of customization."
"Technical support responds quickly."
"It is a scalable solution."
"The initial setup of Oracle Integration Cloud Service was easy."
"The OIC is very good."
"OIC's accuracy is quite good."
"The out-of-box integration between Oracle and SAP is really beneficial"
"It can be a bit challenging to use."
"An area for improvement for Azure Logic Apps could be enhancing its ability to handle large datasets. When dealing with extensive data, we often have to use Azure Data Factory, which is mostly limited to scheduled jobs."
"Standard documents are fine, but in certain situations, when facing specific errors or issues, partners or consumers expect customized solutions rather than just links to existing documents."
"A room for improvement in Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is that it's expensive. Every step is going to cost you money, so if someone is not doing the steps carefully, at the end of the day, it will cost a lot of money. Each time you execute a step, the cost will depend on how much you use Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, and how many workflow steps you have. Each time a step needs to be executed, there'll be a cost added to your bill. If the developer isn't careful with how he uses the solution, this can blow up the cost. What I'd like to see in the next release of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is for the cost and security to be better."
"Pricing and handling asynchronous processes are the two main areas that need improvement."
"There could be more AI features included in the product."
"The stability of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is stable. However, we have had some issues in the past. They do resolve issues that arise from new releases."
"The support I have received is mixed because in some cases they are accurate, and in others, it was me doing the groundwork and giving feedback for the agent to finally tell me there is an issue in their larger services."
"There are a few features that we noticed are not in the cloud. There are some improvements needed. One example is the graphical user interface that needs to improve, it could be easier to use."
"Configurable timeouts on each connection would be good."
"Lacks features for more complex integrations."
"It would be helpful if there were more tutorials or documentation to learn about Oracle Integration Cloud Service."
"The error retrying mechanism could be improved. If an error occurs, it can be retried automatically, it would be helpful."
"Our client was quite concerned about the cost, which is something that could be reduced."
"The support and resources were lacking — they weren't there."
"Now the platform is not built in a way that you can define."
More Oracle Integration Cloud Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is ranked 2nd in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 31 reviews while Oracle Integration Cloud Service is ranked 3rd in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 32 reviews. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is rated 8.0, while Oracle Integration Cloud Service is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps writes "Has different connectors for workflow and comes with low-code feature". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Integration Cloud Service writes "An integration tool that is highly compatible and easy to maintain". Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is most compared with Mule Anypoint Platform, Boomi iPaaS, SAP Cloud Platform, Workato and webMethods.io Integration, whereas Oracle Integration Cloud Service is most compared with Oracle Data Integrator (ODI), AWS Glue, Mule Anypoint Platform, Oracle GoldenGate and SAP Cloud Platform. See our Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. Oracle Integration Cloud Service report.
See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
