We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure Logic Apps and Mule Anypoint Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The design is highly beneficial. It functions as a sandbox environment."
"The solution's most valuable feature is the no-code/low-code feature."
"I am impressed with the tool's UI and analytics."
"We can write external features and transfer the data using JPIMs securely which has been most valuable."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is the many available connectors that make automation easy. Additionally, the security of the solution is good."
"Connectors are very useful for streamlining data integration tasks."
"What I found most valuable in Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is that you can run a workflow or do a high-level process orchestration, then you can call the other function and fulfill the process. For example, if you want to update a customer, you first need to get the customer's phone number and simulate the steps of the process, then Microsoft Azure Logic Apps can orchestrate that process."
"The solution's best feature is that it is compatible with the cloud and has many connectors and third-party adapters."
"The most valuable feature is the variety of characters Anypoint Platform has. It is very scalable and customizable."
"This is the easiest and best tool available."
"The ability to define multi-tiered APIs and reuse them is a fantastic platform feature."
"The solution's deployment and proxy processes are very good."
"The product is very user-friendly."
"The solution's market place for different kinds of integration platforms is the most valuable feature."
"When we talk about the APIs, there are multiple policies one can apply on APIs, like rate limiting policies, OWASP policies, and OWASP security policies, that can be easily configured in Mule Anypoint Platform."
"The community manager is the standout feature of the Mule Anypoint Platform, as it provides a platform to showcase your API to external parties. It is exceptionally user-friendly and enables external parties to easily utilize and consume the APIs."
"The solution should include more connectors."
"The product needs improvement in getting direct access to the code and versioning."
"Microsoft Azure Logic Apps can improve by continually updating the connectors to make them better."
"An area of improvement I've encountered is related to the number of connectors available in Logic Apps. While there are many connectors, I found that the "send email" connector may not work as expected, and one has to rely on Office 365 plugins or other alternatives. This could enhance user experience, especially when considering the additional overhead and licensing requirements associated with Office 365. It also needs to improve security features."
"The only thing is, sometimes, when we need a specific connector, it requires an enterprise or paid version. If it were possible to provide the most commonly used connectors for pulling data from different sources free of cost, that would be really nice."
"It would be beneficial to have less code and tighter integration between different cloud services."
"It can be a bit challenging to use."
"I find the current interface useful, but I could see how others would want the UI bits that are used for creating Logic Apps to be simplified."
"Mule should have better B2B integration."
"What I hear from my customers is that it's very expensive compared to the cost of other integration suites. The cost keeps increasing. MuleSoft should come up with customization factors by using a different way of getting the cost-related stuff to attract customers. That is, they should come up with some cost optimizations."
"The runtime management and connectors could use some work and are vulnerable to breakage after upgrades."
"MuleSoft's release calendar is rather conventional with two major, two minor releases and hotfixes in between. The competition sometimes offer more rapid release cycles and provides improved and new functionality with a faster time-to-market."
"The stability could be better."
"There is not much information on the internet...The transforming message is an area in the solution that needs to be improved."
"The solution is very expensive. They need to work on the pricing."
"The pricing can be a little bit less."
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is ranked 2nd in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 31 reviews while Mule Anypoint Platform is ranked 1st in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 41 reviews. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is rated 8.0, while Mule Anypoint Platform is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps writes "Has different connectors for workflow and comes with low-code feature". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mule Anypoint Platform writes "Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations". Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is most compared with Boomi iPaaS, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SAP Cloud Platform, Workato and webMethods.io Integration, whereas Mule Anypoint Platform is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, SAP Process Orchestration, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SAP Cloud Platform and Azure Data Factory. See our Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. Mule Anypoint Platform report.
See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.