We performed a comparison between Microsoft .NET Framework and Oracle SOA Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Infrastructure solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is easy to use."
"Microsoft Platform is the only viable solution when I wish to do something that is not supposed to be cross-platform."
"It's easy to create and integrate things."
"The technology is very scalable and accessible to use."
"The .NET Framework simplified operations dealing with the allocation and deallocation of memory spaces and the additional processing resources."
"The most valuable feature is customization."
"User-friendly and straightforward."
"Pre-programmed functions for .NET Framework are widely available."
"It performs better in real-time transactions."
"Conceptually, how it integrates a lot of essential enterprise process components. That's the most valuable."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the option to design, and the development can happen at the same time."
"In case there is something that doesn't work out of the box, you have the flexibility to customize it."
"The new product has come out with SOA Cloud Service and Integration Analytics as well, which gives more options for clients to pick their point of requirements."
"I would rate my experience with the initial setup an eight out of ten, where one is difficult, and ten is easy."
"The most valuable feature of the facility, as the partner link, is to try to use third-party services and logic in your own vehicle to orchestrate the information."
"Middleware jobs developing for EC, ERP, and shipping systems become easier."
"The integration capability of the product with AI is an area with certain shortcomings, where improvements are required."
"The solution could improve by optimizing the memory for better performance."
"If Microsoft would provide a monthly subscription at a cost that a developer can afford then it would be really helpful."
"Microsoft has its own product called Blazor, but I don't think it's quite as powerful yet as React or Angular. That's an area for improvement."
"The initial setup is complex."
"In my opinion, this solution can be improved by providing out-of-the-box support for different types of libraries."
"The integration with DevOps tools, such as Azure DevOps, Jira, and GitLab, would be a valuable addition."
"Microsoft could improve .NET Framework by providing more resources to help users understand the solution."
"I want to see easier integration connections with other cloud-based tools."
"It's also not developer-friendly."
"Its function options can be improved."
"Other solutions might be better componets such as Salesforce."
"The solutions can improve the communication or translations between formats, such as JSON and XML. The JSON REST API could improve."
"Decrease the number of internal resources which the product uses."
"The interface is too complicated. Making modifications still requires too much technical knowledge."
"The technical support is good, we have premier support which costs extra."
Microsoft .NET Framework is ranked 4th in Application Infrastructure with 47 reviews while Oracle SOA Suite is ranked 8th in Application Infrastructure with 65 reviews. Microsoft .NET Framework is rated 8.4, while Oracle SOA Suite is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft .NET Framework writes "Intuitive, easier to develop, maintain, and migrate from the old framework to newer versions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle SOA Suite writes "Easy to setup, provides good support and scalable solution ". Microsoft .NET Framework is most compared with IIS, Magic xpa Application Platform, JBoss Enterprise Application Platform, Apache Web Server and Uniface, whereas Oracle SOA Suite is most compared with Mule ESB, WebLogic Suite, Apache Web Server, TIBCO ActiveMatrix and IBM BPM. See our Microsoft .NET Framework vs. Oracle SOA Suite report.
See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.