We performed a comparison between Microsoft Teams and Symphony based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Social Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features are that it is an all-in-one platform, making it very easy for collaboration with your core employees."
"Microsoft Teams is much more stable than other solutions like Skype for Business."
"All of the solution's features are useful since we use it for saving data, chatting, meeting, and all such purposes."
"It's easy to share information and upload and download files on Microsoft Teams."
"I use the solution to chat with my team."
"The product has improved communication in our organization."
"The solution helps us to accelerate communication. We use Teams to contact colleagues during emergencies instead of regular electronic phones. It helps to keep everything organized and centralized in the same place. The product is also very easy to use. I am also impressed with the solution's possibility of making quick calls and creating groups."
"One big advantage of this solution over competitors is it is bundled with Office 365. This makes it more convenient."
"I found the RAM Commander module in Symphony to be the most valuable."
"The solution is user-friendly, and it is very good security-wise."
"The entire product is good."
"Symphony and Laravel are the most comfortable frameworks for any developer. It is also lightweight."
"The overall functions are good."
"I have faced issues with connection. Maybe, it's an issue from my side. The company accounts in Teams has some issues as well. I could not establish calls with certain domains, and then the product asked me to buy a professional account. The problem with Teams is that they are split between professional or company accounts and personal accounts. It's not very clear how you can go from one to another. That's the main issue with teams."
"The tool lacks AI. We will require AI in the solution to be able to integrate with all other tools."
"The solution’s pricing could be improved."
"I don't know how to upgrade some features for integration. It is difficult when it comes to integration with other platforms in some organizations."
"One area where the product could be improved is its operational memory utilization."
"Its screen-sharing feature could be better compared to a few competitors."
"The solution's login process could be more straightforward."
"SharePoint was more robust and customizable earlier."
"To improve the situation, enhancing the functionality for integrating with other applications and addressing ticketing issues is crucial."
"The solution is very expensive, and its pricing could be improved."
"The solution needs to improve CI."
"The area that needs to be improved is modular asset management. When we are uploading the assets in bulk, it is not aligned."
"Compared to established vendors, it lacks user flexibility and customization, especially in the PM module."
Microsoft Teams is ranked 1st in Enterprise Social Software with 145 reviews while Symphony is ranked 8th in Enterprise Social Software with 5 reviews. Microsoft Teams is rated 8.2, while Symphony is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of Microsoft Teams writes "Great for project planning and monitoring with easy communication capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symphony writes "Makes tasks like network planning and performance monitoring much easier". Microsoft Teams is most compared with Atlassian Confluence, SharePoint, Loom, Chatter and Huddle, whereas Symphony is most compared with Slack and Drupal. See our Microsoft Teams vs. Symphony report.
See our list of best Enterprise Social Software vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Social Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
