We performed a comparison between Mojo Networks and Ruckus Wireless based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless LAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is very secure."
"The simplicity is great."
"With Mist, every Wednesday they roll out new features."
"The most useful feature of Juniper Wireless AP is the reporting Marvis."
"The artificial intelligence feature is very good."
"You can easily monitor, manage, and cover all your IT equipment."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is Marvis, the AI-driven network management system."
"The most valuable feature of Juniper Mist is the Virtual Network Assistant, powered by artificial intelligence."
"The most valuable feature is the seamless connection between the end-user on the wireless side."
"The initial setup was easy."
"It has given us a huge leg-up when competing with other managed service providers who use different vendors because of the visibility it gives us to customers' traffic for troubleshooting purposes."
"It is a hundred percent scalable product since its functionalities are good...It is a very stable product."
"The technical support for the solution is very helpful."
"The security is a valuable feature."
"The cloud-based architecture of the controller is valuable because it obviously saves on my hardware costs."
"It's scalable. You don't have to configure an access point. Literally, if I needed a new one, I just take it right out of the box, go plug it into our network. It finds our Mojo network, and then it talks to the other access points that are close to it, and then it literally adopts the policies, and meshes itself in our network."
"We are able to quickly identify Rogue WAPs in our network and move to disconnect them immediately when Ruckus alerts us."
"The solution is very user-friendly."
"The most valuable feature is the performance. It works great."
"All IPs can be managed and monitored by the customer from a single console."
"Ruckus Wireless is a reliable solution."
"The speed between client to client is really nice. It is better than any other vendor, but officially, I cannot say that to people."
"The solution manages and updates itself."
"I like the controller more informative and easier to set up."
"Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points’ support services need improvement."
"There is room for improvement in terms of support and installation."
"Improving third-party integration is key for Juniper Mist's next release."
"If you want to do more specific stuff, it's a bit limited."
"The solution is expensive."
"Juniper Wireless AP can improve by continually improving its reporting and integration with other systems."
"The price could be better."
"It would be helpful to have even stronger security features to help protect against interference from other nearby access points that aren't part of our network."
"The implementation could be simplified. Right now it's a bit complex."
"They could use more additional application security and network security features. They could add on to the WiFi as a selling point. It would be nice to be able to say to the WiFi users, "We will protect you against viruses and malware, so you don't have to purchase that.""
"The product's initial setup phase and configuration are areas with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."
"The renewal costs that come with it are very expensive."
"Further expanding the API and access to even more diagnostics, as I have found a few limitations when I am dealing with them right now."
"The customer service and support took a lot of time to come on the troubleshooting call."
"The user interface could use improvement, and Mojo is working on it. The features and functions are in two different places, and they are in the process of moving them into one place."
"I would like to have a single pane of glass to better control the access point and the switching."
"The cost must be reduced."
"The switching could be improved. The active component requires a data center. Cisco and HPE have a complete solution for data centers. Ruckus has a core solution, but the data center aspect needs to be improved."
"They lack in some hardware stratification."
"The price is an area that requires improvement. The pricing could be better."
"It could be more stable."
"Its security can be improved. It doesn't use Wireless IPS. Therefore, we have to combine WatchGuard that uses a Wireless IPS but is a separate solution. These two solutions work in conjunction. We are using the WatchGuard as a sensor and Wireless IPS, and Ruckus is like a platform that is used for the connectivity of the network."
"They should work to make their licensing more affordable."
"I would like to see newer on-premises controller-type models, similar to the 3000."
More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Pricing and Cost Advice →
Mojo Networks is ranked 20th in Wireless LAN with 17 reviews while Ruckus Wireless is ranked 3rd in Wireless LAN with 97 reviews. Mojo Networks is rated 8.2, while Ruckus Wireless is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Mojo Networks writes "The product is easy to deploy since it can be done seamlessly with zero testing ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ruckus Wireless writes "Great wireless, good reliability, and excellent connectivity". Mojo Networks is most compared with Mist AI and Cloud, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, Aruba Wireless and Cisco Wireless, whereas Ruckus Wireless is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Cisco Wireless, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, Ubiquiti WLAN and Omada Access Points. See our Mojo Networks vs. Ruckus Wireless report.
See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.