We performed a comparison between monday.com and Teamwork based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Project Management Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's very easy to use. When we were trying to pick a system, we looked at Asana, Jira, and other platforms, and they were very cluttered. But monday.com is very user-friendly. As a user, everything is very clear. You don't need to be too tech-savvy to understand it and it's very easy to pick up on and learn."
"The board function allows you to create a digitized to-do list."
"With multiple team members working on multiple fast-moving briefs, tasks, and projects - often remotely and in different timezones - Monday.com has become our reliable source of truth to oversee and manage everything that's going on."
"The automation process is one of the best."
"The handling and administration of Monday.com are manageable even for beginners."
"When you have a tool that anybody can use from all devices, it spares some time so that you could do and handle way more things."
"It has improved our organizational skills and kept us up to the task."
"The value is that monday.com provides us with an overall picture of how much work a teammate has."
"The setup was very easy. Deployment was very fast for us. We started using it within two weeks."
"Teamwork has made process management easier and much better. It is very robust and improves by making a lot of changes. It is easy to use and has lots of reports."
"It is a very stable solution...The initial setup of Teamwork is easy."
"We'd love the ability to be able to build and export reports based on multiple boards."
"The new Apple Mac Book Pro lineup was launched more than two years ago and still, this platform is not compatible with the Mac App."
"I'd like better integration with other services."
"Service being down happens to often. They need to create a desktop version that stores the info locally so that when their servers are down, I can keep working and accessing my data. Then it could be uploaded when their servers are online."
"The solution shouldn't let the system directly pull out Outlook (the Windows default mail system) whenever we click on an email address."
"There are a lot of ways that monday.com does not work, for example, when it comes to HRMS. A particular employee can't apply for leave or check the status of a leave request or check his 401(k) status. Those are things that are missing in monday.com."
"In recent months, Monday.com has been down about once a week."
"The export options are also not yet flexible and comprehensive enough."
"The product is expensive. It needs to have a more robust and customizable calendar."
"The product could be improved with more integrations and a mobile app."
"The screen sharing provided by the solution can be a challenge to a user. Screen sharing is an area that needs improvement in the solution."
monday.com is ranked 1st in Project Management Software with 222 reviews while Teamwork is ranked 23rd in Project Management Software with 3 reviews. monday.com is rated 9.4, while Teamwork is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of monday.com writes "We can collaborate with our customers efficiently and professionally, and automation makes it easy for everyone". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Teamwork writes "A flexible, stable, and scalable tool requiring an easy initial setup phase". monday.com is most compared with Wrike, Asana, Microsoft Dynamics CRM, Zoho CRM and Odoo, whereas Teamwork is most compared with Smartsheet, Jira and OpenText Project and portfolio Management. See our Teamwork vs. monday.com report.
See our list of best Project Management Software vendors and best Project Portfolio Management vendors.
We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.