We performed a comparison between OpenText Exceed TurboX and TeamViewer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Remote Access solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most helpful feature of OpenText Exceed TurboX (ETX) is that it allows you to consume heavy applications that usually have a lot of latency. I also like that the solution is fast and has a friendly UI."
"The solution is perfect for Linux users."
"TeamViewer is fast and easy to manipulate."
"It's a user-friendly product."
"TeamViewer is a scalable solution."
"It saves trips to customer sites, which saves time. I am able to get in there remotely and fix things."
"The most valuable feature of TeamViewer is the remote access connection. Additionally, it is easy to use."
"I have found the solution to be user-friendly even for beginners. It is not that sophisticated. There are different types of security features available, such as encryption and random machine ID."
"TeamViewer is a step ahead of solutions like, for example, AnyDesk."
"TeamViewer is stable."
"The performance of the graphical interface needs improvement. They should add some CPU to speed graphic acceleration."
"An area for improvement in OpenText Exceed TurboX (ETX) is the installation process because you need some technical knowledge to install it. What's lacking in OpenText Exceed TurboX (ETX) is a help portal for users to ask questions and seek assistance."
"If were to I put myself in the seat of a small business owner, I would prefer TeamViewer to be more of a pay-once-and-own-it solution, rather than paying via a subscription model (although I am using the free version). Only annual subscriptions are available. It makes paying for it the first time seem a little daunting."
"This solution could be improved by offering more flexibility in terms of usage."
"It would be useful if the solution could facilitate more than one remote user accessing my desktop at a time."
"Support for mobile devices from Linux has been missing since the Native client was rolled out. This was a nice option, especially when trying to walk somebody who was struggling to understand something on their phone."
"I don’t see any areas where improvement is needed."
"The stability of TeamViewer is good, but it could be better."
"Considering the earlier versions of the product, I think TeamViewer used to slow down the systems."
"I can use up to three computers, but sometimes I have four. So, it would be nice to have at least four computers."
OpenText Exceed TurboX is ranked 11th in Remote Access with 2 reviews while TeamViewer is ranked 1st in Remote Access with 85 reviews. OpenText Exceed TurboX is rated 8.6, while TeamViewer is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of OpenText Exceed TurboX writes "Fast and has a friendly UI; allows you to consume heavy applications". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TeamViewer writes "Solid cross-platform remote control, but with kludgy central management and some serious feature issues on macOS". OpenText Exceed TurboX is most compared with VNC Connect, Citrix Workspace, Microsoft Remote Desktop Services, VMware Horizon and Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization for Desktops, whereas TeamViewer is most compared with TeamViewer Tensor, Microsoft Remote Desktop Services, Parallels Access, ISL Online and BeyondTrust Remote Support. See our OpenText Exceed TurboX vs. TeamViewer report.
See our list of best Remote Access vendors.
We monitor all Remote Access reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.